Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This project is aimed at understanding whether a new fast-dissolving cheek-administered cannabidiol strip will be absorbed better into the body than cannabidiol powder. The results of this study will help guide dosage formulation choices as well as dosing regimens in NFL athletes for concussion management.
Full description
Cannabis formulations are typically administered by the oral route of administration. This route represents the most common administration route for most pharmaceuticals due to the ease of administration and convenience. Inhalational products are not acceptable for the sport's athlete population due to potential damage to lung tissues. Topical products do not have adequate bioavailability to meet our therapeutic objectives. Our PK studies, then, need to employ the same dosage form and route of administration we expect to use in future clinical efficacy trials.
Given the low bioavailability expected with CBD oral formulations, we wish to assess two different formulations and the relative extent of CBD absorption. Our future planned CBD intervention studies in athletes will require use of larger doses of CBD. The formulation with the larger bioavailability will help to reduce the overall size of the dose utilized and therefore reduce the amount of product exposure in our clinical intervention studies. This will increase the likelihood that a Cannabis company can supply the necessary amount of product and reduce the overall cost associated with the studies. Generally speaking, based on current literature published around CBD administration for therapeutic application, higher doses of CBD (i.e., 50mg/kg/d) were found to correlate to more positive outcomes than lower doses (i.e., 1mg/kg/d). Assuming an average weight of 70 kg, a 1000 mg dose would be around 14.29 mg/kg, and a 3000 mg dose around 42.86 mg/kg. This will allow us to investigate the pharmacokinetics of CBD on both ends of the hypothetical efficacy trend. Studies have examined single orally administered doses up to 6000 mg with no serious adverse effects reported.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
20 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jane Alcorn, DVM;PhD; Abdul Salama, PharmD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal