Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Introduction- During laparoscopic procedures surgical field exposure is one of the crucial aspects for a successful surgery. Exposure can be optimized by pneumoperitoneum, positioning of the patient and muscle relaxation.
The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery has recommended using the lowest intraperitoneal pressure allowing adequate exposure of the operative field rather than using a routine pressure. A way to lower intraabdominal pressure during laparoscopic procedures is to employ a deeper level of neuromuscular blockade.
Intravenous (IV) opioids such as fentanyl and remifentanil are commonly used to provide analgesia and supplement sedation during general anesthesia.
In terms of analgesia, management of intraoperative stress, remifentanil exhibits similar effects to fentanyl in adult healthy volunteers and surgical patients.
In clinical practice, if the surgeon asks for relaxation toward the end of the surgery, then many anesthesiologists will increase the dose of the IV opioids. In our experience the use of remifentanil achieves a better muscle relaxation and surgical space exposure with a lower intraabdominal pressure and less need for a neuromuscular blockage as compared to fentanyl.
Thus, the investigators aimed to compare the use of fentanyl versus remifentanil during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Because surgical complications due to inadequate exposure are a rare event, the typical way to study this issue is to use surgeon's satisfaction score.
Full description
Study design- Prospective, single-center single blind randomized controlled trial. Patients electively admitted for laparoscopic hysterectomy will be approached for requirement. After obtaining a written informed consent, patients will be randomly assigned either to the study group (Remifentanil group) or to the control group (Fentanyl group) in a 1:1 ratio. A blocked randomization scheme will be created using a computer-generated list of random numbers.
study protocol-
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
76 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
MIchal De Wolf
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal