Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The prevention of secondary brain injury is a primary goal in treating patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Secondary brain injury results from tissue ischemia induced by increased vascular resistance in the at-risk brain tissue due to compression by traumatic hematomas, and development of cytotoxic and vasogenic tissue edema. While traumatic hematomas may be managed surgically, cytotoxic and vasogenic edema with resulting perfusion impairment perpetuates brain ischemia and injury. Animal models suggest that remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) can reverse these effects and improve perfusion. Based on these findings it is hypothesized that RIC will exert beneficial effects on TBI in man, thereby representing a new therapeutic strategy for severe TBI.
Patients presenting to our institution suffering from severe TBI will be considered for enrollment. Eligible patients will have sustained a blunt, severe TBI (defined by Glasgow Coma Scale <8) with associated intra-cranial hematoma(s) not requiring immediate surgical decompression, with admission to an intensive care unit and insertion of an intra-cranial pressure monitor. Patients will be randomized to RIC versus sham-RIC intervention cohorts. RIC interventions will be performed using an automated device on the upper extremity delivering 20 cumulative minutes of limb ischemia in a single treatment session. The planned enrollment is a cohort of 40 patients.
Outcomes of this study will include multiple domains. Our primary outcome will include serial assessments of validated serum biomarkers of neuronal injury and systemic inflammation. Secondary outcomes will include descriptions of the clinical course of each patient, radiologic assessment of brain perfusion, and neurocognitive and psychological assessment post-discharge.
If clinical outcomes are improved using RIC, this study would support RIC as a novel treatment for TBI. Its advantages include safety and simplicity and, requiring no specialized equipment, its ability to be used in any environment including pre-hospital settings or in austere theatres. The investigators anticipate that TBI patients treated with RIC will have improved clinical, biochemical, and neuropsychological outcomes compared to standard treatment protocols.
Full description
Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in victims of blunt trauma, leading to a tremendous economic cost, chronic neuropsychological sequelae and productive years of life lost. Treatment of inoperable primary brain injury consists largely of supportive care to support natural healing and prevention or reduction of secondary insults (1).
Many of the phenomena of secondary injury are related to ischemic sequelae of injury progression. Brain parenchymal edema increases both regional and global intra-cranial pressures, decreasing perfusion pressure, resulting in impaired perfusion, an oxygen debt, and ischemic injury (2). Local compression from traumatic hematomas may act in concert with edema to further impair perfusion. One strategy that has been successfully employed in the treatment of other ischemic insults is an intervention known as "remote ischemic conditioning" (RIC). RIC is felt to induce systemic responses which promote physiologic adaptations to moderate ischemia and minimize the impact of subsequent ischemic insults. Because these effects are systemic, extremity ischemic conditioning may impact brain injury. In the setting of TBI, where all patients carry a risk of ischemic secondary injury, early intervention with RIC may minimize the harm of secondary ischemic insults and improve outcomes.
The systemic effects of RIC have been demonstrated in a variety of organ systems and mechanisms of ischemia. Application of RIC has demonstrable benefits in preventing ischemia-induced organ dysfunction in insults to the heart (3-6), kidneys (7,8), and ocular organ systems (9). Our recent work has demonstrated its benefit in preventing organ injury following hemorrhagic shock (10). The technique has also demonstrated promise in reducing brain injury secondary to stroke or neurosurgical trauma (11-13).
Ischemic conditioning of brain injuries has proven benefits in animal models. Limb preconditioning reduces toxic oxygen free radicals, reduces neuronal apoptosis, reduces intra-cranial inflammation, improves integrity of the blood-brain barrier, and reduces brain parenchymal edema (14,15). RIC also improves microvascular perfusion to ischemic tissues which, in the brain, may reduce secondary injury by promoting perfusion to the at-risk injured brain (16). Even when performed after the intra-cranial trauma in a "post-conditioning" model, limb ischemic conditioning is associated with decreased apoptosis, decreased edema, and decreased brain infarction volumes (17,18). A single recent trial of RIC in human TBI patients showed a decrease in serum biomarkers of central nervous system (CNS) injury in the conditioned cohort (19).
Given the promising findings of the remote ischemic conditioning technique in reducing biomarkers of intra-cranial inflammation, an assessment of the clinical effectiveness of post-traumatic remote ischemic conditioning in modifying the outcomes of patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injuries is warranted.
Outcomes of this proposed prospective, randomized controlled trial will fall into the following validated categories:
The known physiologic effects of RIC are theoretically beneficial to patients suffering severe TBI who are at risk of clinical deterioration due to secondary injury. By mitigating the effects of inflammation and edema and improving microvascular perfusion, at-risk brain tissue may be salvaged and thus patient outcomes improved. This theory is supported by the existing evidence and a well-planned selection of outcome measures including biochemical, clinical, and radiographic outcomes may demonstrate the benefits of RIC in this patient population.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
44 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Shawn Rhind, PhD; Ori D Rotstein, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal