ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Remplissage Versus Latarjet Coracoid Transfer for Recurrent Shoulder Instability

W

Western University, Canada

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Shoulder Dislocation

Treatments

Procedure: Latarjet coracoid transfer
Procedure: Bankart Repair plus Remplissage

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a pilot study designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair and Remplissage with an open Latarjet coracoid transfer for the treatment of recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability with subcritical bone loss.

Full description

Presently, consensus guidelines for the surgical management of anterior glenohumeral instability are lacking. While there has been continual evolution in available arthroscopic instrumentation, this has not translated to improvements in patient outcomes. Isolated arthroscopic bankart repair is often associated with unacceptably high rates of failure, with a recent systematic review identifying continued recurrence rates of 14.2%. Improved recognition of bone defects and identification of critical defect sizes that contribute to recurrent instability and failed stabilization have lead to improvements in treatment algorithms. It has been widely accepted that glenoid defects exceeding 20% of anteroposterior (AP) width and humeral head defects exceeding 30% of the humeral head width contribute to recurrent instability. For defects of this magnitude, isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair is insufficient in restoring joint stability, and more extensive procedures are required. This can include adding a remplissage to the arthroscopic Bankart repair or open allograft reconstruction for humeral defects; or Latarjet coracoid transfer for glenoid defects.

However, often patients present with combined 'bipolar' bone loss, where individual defects are subcritical in size. There is increasing recognition that the presence of this combined bone loss may lead to increased rates of failure with an isolated arthroscopic bankart repair. Currently, accepted treatment options for bipolar bone loss include a combined arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage, or a Latarjet coracoid transfer. While there is supportive biomechanical data for each procedure, and limited case series in the literature, there remains a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide treatment for this complex clinical scenario. Consequently, we aim to perform a pilot study designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopic Bankart repair and Remplissage with an open Latarjet coracoid transfer.

Enrollment

30 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

15 to 60 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • anterior shoulder instability (>1 dislocation)
  • age >14 years
  • evidence of a Hill-Sachs defect on MRI or CT,
  • < 20% anteroposterior glenoid bone loss

Exclusion criteria

  • >20% anteroposterior glenoid bone loss
  • significant shoulder comorbidities (i.e., osteoarthritis, previous surgery other than previous instability), active joint or systemic infection, significant muscle paralysis, rotator cuff or Charcot's arthropathy,
  • significant medical comorbidity that may alter effectiveness of surgical intervention
  • major medical illness,
  • unable to speak French or English,
  • psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent,
  • unwilling to be followed for 2 years

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

30 participants in 2 patient groups

Bankart Repair and Remplissage
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients randomized to the all-arthroscopic group (Bankart repair and remplissage) will undergo a standard arthroscopic anterior labral repair with a minimum of 3 suture anchors, followed by remplissage with 1 or 2 anchors, at the discretion of the treating surgeon.
Treatment:
Procedure: Bankart Repair plus Remplissage
Latarjet Coracoid Transfer
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients randomized to the open Latarjet coracoid transfer will undergo a Latarjet coracoid transfer through a deltopectoral approach and horizontal split in the subscapularis at the superior 2/3, inferior 1/3 junction. The coracoid process will be oriented in the conventional manner, with the inferior surface against the glenoid vault, secured with two cannulated screws
Treatment:
Procedure: Latarjet coracoid transfer

Trial contacts and locations

2

Loading...

Central trial contact

Stacey Wanlin

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems