Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain

Izmir Katip Celebi University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Post-stroke Shoulder Pain

Treatments: Device: Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05601921

2021-TDU-TIPF-0013

Details and patient eligibility

About

Shoulder pain after stroke is one of the most common complications of stroke. Underlying mechanisms of shoulder pain after stroke still completely is not clarified. Central sensitization and neuropathic pain mechanisms are thought to play a role in the etiology of pain. Research on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy in the treatment of pain in which somatosensory sensitization mechanisms play a role is increasing day by day. There are studies showing that application of high-frequency rTMS to the primary motor cortex provides effective pain relieving in most of painful conditions. However, data in the literature regarding the application of high-frequency rTMS in shoulder pain after stroke are very limited. There is only one clinical study related to this. More studies are needed in this area.In our study, it was aimed to examine the effects of this treatment protocol applied on the effects of pain on daily activities, upper extremity disability, anxiety, depression, range of motion and neurophysiological parameters.

Full description

Stroke is one of the most common causes of disability and death in the adult population. Many complications such as depression, shoulder pain, falls, urinary system infections can develop after stroke. These complications prevent stroke rehabilitation and delay functional recovery. Hemiplegic shoulder pain is also one of the most common complications after stroke. Many possible causes underlying its development have been described; It may develop due to many pathologies such as rotator cuff lesions, biceps tendinopathy, soft tissue disorders such as myofascial pain, glenohumeral subluxation, spasticity, changes in peripheral and central nervous system activity. Many options such as joint range of motion (ROM) exercises, electrical stimulation, analgesics, intra-articular injections of corticosteroids, botulinum toxin-A injections are used in the management of pain. However, current treatment options provide limited pain relief, which causes chronic pain in many patients. This suggests that post-stroke shoulder pain is not only due to simple nociceptive stimuli from the shoulder joint, but also includes nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms related to both the peripheral and central nervous systems. In recent years, TMS studies have been conducted in many painful conditions, which are thought to have complex pain mechanisms in the pathogenesis, and its effectiveness has been reported.In our study, it was aimed to examine the effects of this treatment protocol applied on the effects of pain on daily activities, upper extremity disability, anxiety, depression, range of motion and neurophysiological parameters.

Enrollment: 18 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18 to 70 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Being between the ages of 18-70
• Presence of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke confirmed by MRI
• Having a stroke for the first time
• Presence of stroke in the subacute or chronic period
• Presence of subacute or chronic shoulder pain starting after stroke and Numeric Rating Scale >4
• If the patient is receiving analgesic treatment, the pain persists despite at least one week of analgesic treatment.
• Patients who agreed to participate by signing the informed permission form.

Exclusion criteria

• Presence of history of surgical intervention on the shoulder joint
• Presence of history of peri/intraarticular injection into the shoulder joint
• Rotator cuff injury or tendonitis, frozen shoulder, etc. that they had diagnosed/treated before stroke
• Presence of full-thickness rotator cuff tear visualized by US
• Presence of >3 spasticity in the upper extremity defined according to the Modified Ashworth Scale
• Presence of severe cognitive impairment
• Presence of aphasia
• History of malignancy or systemic rheumatic disease
• Alcohol or drug addiction
• History of psychiatric illness such as major depression/personality disorders
• History of epilepsy or taking medication due to epilepsy
• Diagnosed with dementia
• Pregnancy and breastfeeding
• Having received TMS treatment before
• Having a clinical condition (metallic implant, cardiac pace, head trauma, cranial operation history...) that would be a contraindication for TMS

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

18 participants in 2 patient groups

Active stimulation group

Experimental group

Description:

Patients in the real stimulation group will receive rTMS treatment to the motor cortex (M1) of the affected hemisphere at a frequency of 5 Hz, once a day for 3 weeks and a total of 15 sessions. The application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. Before each session, the patient's resting motor threshold (RMT) value will be determined. RMT will be detected by obtaining a motor evoked potential of \>50 μV amplitude on electromyography recording of the contralateral first dorsal interosseous muscle in at least five out of 10 stimulations to the primary motor cortex.The stimulus intensity to be used in the treatment will be set as 90% of the motor threshold for the affected motor cortex and 100% of the motor threshold for the unaffected motor cortex.One session of stimulation will last for a total of 20 minutes and a total of 1000 pulses in the form of 5 Hz stimulation.

Treatment:

Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham stimulation group

Sham Comparator group

Description:

Fifteen sessions of sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment will be applied to the lesional primary motor cortex. The application will be performed with Neurosoft-Neuro MS / D device. The probe of the device will be held perpendicular to the motor cortex and operated from the lowest operating power of 1, so that the device makes the same sounds as the active application.

Treatment:

Device: Sham Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation