Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
This study evaluates targeted subsidies as a strategy to improve sanitation infrastructure and behaviours in communities that have reached Open Defecation Free (ODF) status after a Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) program. The investigator's hypothesis is that sanitation subsidies targeted at the most vulnerable households within ODF communities will increase and help sustain latrine coverage, quality, and use amongst the targeted households, and through a spill-over effect, amongst the rest of the community. Half of participating communities will receive the targeted subsidy, while the other half will not receive any treatment.
Full description
Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a widely used approach to eradicate open defecation in rural communities in developing countries. Using emotional triggers, CLTS promotes community self-help to build household latrines. In Ghana, where CLTS is part of the government's official sanitation strategy, a community is declared "Open Defecation Free" (ODF) when 80 percent of households own a latrine.
There is however evidence that open defecation persists in so-called "ODF" communities, especially as the most vulnerable households (the poorest of the poor) cannot afford to construct or maintain durable latrines. As a result, subsidies for these vulnerable households have been proposed as a strategy to promote the construction of durable latrines and help sustain safe sanitation behaviours in communities having received CLTS.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
This study is a cluster randomized controlled trial that will enroll entire communities. Within a community, only specific households will be selected to receive sanitation subsidy vouchers. Outcomes will be measured both for voucher recipients and for the rest of the community.
Inclusion Criteria (for Communities):
Exclusion Criteria (for Communities):
Inclusion Criteria (for voucher recipients within study communities):
Exclusion Criteria (for voucher recipients within study communities):
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
5,615 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal