Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, single blind, two-arm, multicenter clinical evaluation.
Diabetic patients (n=112) with de novo coronary artery disease will be randomized to one of the 2 treatment arms: 1) Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent or 2) Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent implantation is effective in reducing neointimal hyperplasia as compared to Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent in diabetic patients, using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) as the primary imaging modality.
Full description
In patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be associated with greater neointimal suppression than bare-metal stents. However, there is an ongoing debate on the optimal drug-eluting stent in diabetic patients.
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled, single blind, two-arm, multicenter clinical evaluation.
Diabetic patients (n=112) with de novo coronary artery disease will be randomized to one of the 2 treatment arms: 1) Reservoir-Based Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent or 2) Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Polymer-Free Amphilimus-Eluting Stent implantation is effective in reducing neointimal hyperplasia as compared to Polymer-Based Everolimus-Eluting Stent in diabetic patients, using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) as the primary imaging modality.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Clinical Inclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
112 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal