ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Ventricle to Ventricle Timing in Heart Failure Patients

Abbott logo

Abbott

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 4

Conditions

Heart Failure

Treatments

Device: Sequential VV Pacing
Device: Simultaneous VV Pacing

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefit of interventricular (V-V) delay optimization in reducing the non-responder rate in patients with cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. The primary endpoint of this study is CRT responder rate.

For patients enrolled with new CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:

  • < 10% improvement in 6-minute hall walk, and
  • no class improvement or worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) scale.

For those receiving CRT-D devices as replacements of older CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:

  • > 1 heart failure (HF) related hospitalization, and
  • no class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale.

Full description

Study Methods

  • This is a prospective, randomized (simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing vs. sequential BiV pacing) study.

  • Any patient that receives an FDA approved St. Jude Medical (SJM) CRT-D with V-V timing is eligible for enrollment.

  • At 3 months post enrollment (or at implant for CRT-D replacements), patients screened as non-responders are randomized to either simultaneous or sequential BiV pacing. Patients requiring a replacement CRT-D device that are identified as non-responders to CRT are enrolled at the screening/randomization visit.

  • Patients are followed for a period of 6 months post randomization:

    • Enrollment (1 week pre CRT-D implant to < 2 weeks post CRT-D implant)
    • Screening/Randomization Visit (3 months post enrollment)
    • Follow-up Visit (6 months post randomization)
  • Total # of centers - 80 centers

  • Sample size - 800 patients screened for CRT non-responders

Enrollment

816 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient has a standard indication for a CRT-D.

  • Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk with the only limiting factor to be fatigue or shortness of breath.

  • Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule.

  • Prior to 1 month of randomization, patient's HF medications are maintained stable and remain stable throughout the study.

  • Patients requiring a CRT-D replacement must comply with BOTH of the following:

    • > 1 HF related hospitalization
    • No class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale

Exclusion criteria

  • Patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months.
  • Patient has had cardiac surgery within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Patient has an epicardial ventricular lead system.
  • Patient is less than 18 years old.
  • Patient is pregnant.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

816 participants in 2 patient groups

Simultaneous VV Pacing
Active Comparator group
Description:
Programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing
Treatment:
Device: Simultaneous VV Pacing
Sequential VV Pacing
Active Comparator group
Description:
Programmed to sequential biventricular pacing
Treatment:
Device: Sequential VV Pacing

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems