Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The investigators hope to determine if "wet" AMD patients differ from patients with "dry" AMD or normal eyes in the production of anti-retinal pigment epithelium (anti-RPE) or anti-retinal antibody formation. To explain: the immune system can make antibodies that attack our own cells, specifically the RPE and the retina. Normally the RPE and retinal cells are ignored by the immune system, but when disease occurs, immune reactions can occur, making an autoantibody that can attack the patient's own cells and make things worse. This production of autoantibodies that react with our own RPE and retinal cells is what the investigators want to test in this proposal to see if they may contribute to, or are responsible for, a poor response to treatment.
The investigators also want to know how those patients who initially respond to the standard-of-care treatment, ranibizumab injections, differ in the production of anti-RPE or anti-retinal antibody formation, from those patients who do not respond initially after 4 consecutive injections.
Full description
Up to 10% of patients with neovascular AMD treated with ranibizumab respond poorly or worsen despite therapy. The reason for this lack of response is unclear. We have preliminary data that suggests abnormal autoimmune activity is apparent in these patients. Previous studies have shown evidence of retinal autoimmunity in AMD patients, but there is very little data describing any specific immunologic commonality that correlates with disease and/or poor response. (8,9) Perhaps just as significantly there is little data regarding the immunologic activity of age-matched normals, making published data hard to evaluate especially in this age group in which autoimmunity is known to increase. (8,9) While there are many known retinal antigens in autoimmune retinal disease, the role of these antigens is not well established in AMD and not all the antigens have been identified. (24) Moreover, RPE-reactivities are only beginning to be understood in ocular disease. (25-27) We intend to address humoral responses in AMD by making a systematic comparison of the immunologic activity of ranibizumab responders, ranibizumab initial non-responders, and a comparable population of age-sex-race matched normal controls. Data suggests that 5 groups of patients are evident after 3 treatments with ranibizumab: 1) rapid responders, 2) delayed responders, 3) gradual responders, 4) acutenon-responders and 5) chronic non-responders. We hypothesize that non-responders and gradual responders may in fact be patients with complicating underlying autoimmune activity involving retinal and RPE antigens, which are exposed secondary to the breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier during CNV development. We will study this humoral response (antibody production) over the treatment period, as it likely is changing at different rates in the patients with different responses. In addition we will correlate underlying genetic phenotype in these patients.
For this study, we plan to look at 2 treatment groups and 2 control groups:
This is an open-label study assessing antibody formation (anti-RPE and anti-retinal) in 5 groups. Group 1 (n=40) will include neovascular AMD patients treated with ranibizumab. Patients will be included and receive 4 ranibizumab 0.5mg intravitreally at 4-6 week intervals and then twice more "as needed" (PRN) at 4-6 week intervals. After the 4th ranibizumab injection, if a Group 1 patient has not responded (persistent fluid on OCT), they will be moved into Group 3 (anti-VEGF acute non-responders) or Group 5 (anti-VEGF chronic non-responders). This will reduce the eventual number of subjects enrolled in Group 1 to approximately 36, as we anticipate approximately 4 subjects to have to move to either Group 3 or Group 5 as a non-responder. Group 2 (n=40) will be an age-sex-race matched normal subjects from the population that does not have AMD. Group 3 (n=8) and Group 5 (n=7) (for a combined total of 15 subjects, approximately 4 of whom transferred from Group 1) include patients treated with 4 or more injections of anti-VEGF treatment at 4-8 week intervals without an initial response (Initial non-response is defined as < 100 microns of improved [decreased] retinal thickening by OCT). Group 3 patients, the acute non-responders, will be included after the 4th injection and followed for 2 more visits at 4-8 week intervals during which time they can receive "as needed" anti-VEGF treatment(s) at the investigator's discretion for any fluid on OCT. Group 4 (n=40) will be age-sex-race matched patients with Dry AMD as controls for immune response before there is a neovascular response. Group 5 patients, the chronic non-responders, will be included after the 4th injection and followed for one (1) visit at Month 4 during which time they can receive an "as needed" anti-VEGF treatment at the investigator's discretion for any fluid on OCT.
NOTE: Only 10% of Group 1 (approximately 4 patients) are expected to be non-responders, therefore, 11 of the Group 3 and Group 5 subjects will be patients treated outside the study who are found to be non-responders by chart review. These patients will then be enrolled at the Month 4 visit to supplement the subjects transferred from Group 1 for a total of 15 patients in Groups 3 and 5.
We will use Western blotting for global assessment of all autoantibodies against the full complement of retinal proteins in both normal individuals (Group 2) and those treated for exudative AMD (Group 1), those initial non-responders to ranibizumab (Group 3), and patients with "dry" AMD (Group 4).
Genotyping (CFH and HTRA1) will be performed on all Groups. Approximately 25 ml (2 tablespoons) of blood will be sent to Dr. Khang Zhang of the Shiley Eye Center at the University of California, San Diego and he will perform the genetics analysis.
This study will investigate if antibody production differs between nv AMD patients (Groups 1, 3 and 5) and the normal population (Group 2), if it differs between ranibizumab responders (Group 1) and non-responders to any anti-VEGF treatment (Groups 3 and 5), and we will also see how patients with dry AMD (Group 4) compare with the nv AMD groups (Groups 1, 3, and 5).
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Group 1 (Ranibizumab Responders):
Group 2 (Normal Controls):
Group 3 (Anti-VEGF Initial Non-responders):
Group 4 ("Dry" AMD):
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
131 participants in 5 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal