Status
Conditions
About
The objective of the study was to compare the therapeutic benefit of capmatinib versus appropriate comparative therapy (ACT) defined by the German HTA agency G-BA for its benefit assessment of capmatinib but also versus the standard of care (SoC) practiced in German routine care. Due to its design as an adjusted, patient-level comparison, the RECAP study addresses the evidence gap due to the single-arm nature of pivotal evidence for capmatinib.
For this purpose, data on patients treated with ACT resp. SoC in German routine care has been collected via a retrospective chart review. This data was then used as an external control for a non-randomized, patient-level adjusted comparison with data from the GEOMETRY mono-1 study of capmatinib (NCT02414139).
Due to the non-interventional nature of this study, the definition of endpoints as primary or secondary was omitted formally.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
NSCLC (any histology)
Stage IV or Stage IIIB without indication for local therapy
First or second line of treatment
Age ≥18 years Exclusion criteria
Prior treatment with crizotinib, capmatinib, tepotinib or other MET inhibitors
Carcinomatous meningitis
Symptomatic brain metastases
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Status (ECOG) >1
Uncontrolled, clinically significant heart diseases
Malignant disease other than NSCLC within the past 3 years
260 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal