Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 3D-printed liver models in hepatobiliary surgery planning compared to traditional digital simulations. It is conducted in three phases:
Full description
The study was conducted in three phases to assess the effectiveness of 3D-printed liver models for hepatobiliary surgery planning, comparing these models with traditional digital simulations.
Phase One: This phase involved the development and validation of 35 3D-printed liver models. The focus was on timeliness, cost, precision, and alignment with digital planning tools. The goal was to ensure that the physical models accurately represented the liver's anatomy as planned digitally.
Phase Two: In this phase, the 3D reconstruction process was optimized using deep learning techniques. The study compared AI-assisted automatic segmentation with manual methods to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of the models. This phase aimed to streamline the model creation process and reduce the time and effort required.
Phase Three: This phase conducted a retrospective comparative analysis involving 64 patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery. These patients were divided into two groups: one group used validated physical 3D models, and the other group used digital simulations for surgical planning. The phase evaluated various surgical outcomes, including the extent of resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization duration. The primary objective was to determine the clinical effectiveness of using 3D-printed models compared to traditional digital simulations in hepatobiliary surgery planning.
By systematically analyzing these three phases, the study aims to provide comprehensive insights into the benefits and potential limitations of using 3D-printed models in surgical planning, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes and surgical precision.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
64 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal