ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Rewards for Cannabis Abstinence-study (RECAB)

P

Parnassia Addiction Research Centre

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Cannabis Use Disorder

Treatments

Behavioral: Standard Outpatient Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Behavioral: Abstinence-focused Contingency Management (CM) - stand alone

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT05836207
10390012110082

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness of contingency management (CM) compared with Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for the treatment of cannabis use disorder (CUD) in youth (16-22 years).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the efficacy of 12 weeks outpatient CM versus CBT in youths with a CUD, in terms of cannabis abstinence during the intervention period?
  • What is the long-term efficacy of CM versus CBT at 6- and 12-months follow-up (FU)?
  • What is the cost-effectiveness of CM versus CBT at 12-months FU from a societal perspective?

Study hypotheses are:

  1. CM will result in more cannabis-abstinent days than CBT during the intervention; 2. CM is more effective and cost-effective than CBT at 12 months follow-up.

Eligible patients (n=154) will be randomly assigned to either 12 weeks of outpatient CM or CBT. Assessments are conducted by trained research-assistants at baseline, after 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks, and twice-weekly during treatment and consist of questionnaires, a computer task and collection of urine samples. Primary endpoint is the number of biochemically verified cannabis abstinent days in the 12-week treatment period. Key secondary endpoint: Treatment response: 50% or more reduction in cannabis use days in the past 4 weeks, compared with baseline.

The primary outcome will be modelled in the intention-to-treat population in a (negative binomial) regression analysis with treatment group as independent variable and stratification variables as covariates.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis (CEA; CUA) will be performed from a societal perspective. CEA: Treatment response is the central clinical endpoint for calculations of incremental costs per responder. CUA: Incremental costs per QALY (based on EuroQoL).

Enrollment

154 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

16 to 22 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Youths (16-22 years) seeking treatment for a primary CUD
  • Regular cannabis use (≥14 days) in past 4 weeks
  • Intention to cease cannabis use during intervention
  • Able and willing to attend the treatment center and submit urine samples under supervision twice-weekly
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Health contra-indications (e.g., acute psychosis/suicidality)
  • Insufficient Dutch language.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

154 participants in 2 patient groups

Abstinence-focused Contingency Management (CM)
Experimental group
Description:
Youths receive 12 weeks of outpatient abstinence-focused CM consisting of providing incentives for cannabis abstinence, based on twice-weekly rapid test urinalysis.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Abstinence-focused Contingency Management (CM) - stand alone
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Active Comparator group
Description:
Youths receive 12 weeks of outpatient usual care CBT consisting of once-weekly 60-minute sessions according to the standard CBT youth protocol by a trained psychologist.
Treatment:
Behavioral: Standard Outpatient Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)

Trial contacts and locations

5

Loading...

Central trial contact

Eva Garssen, MsC; Renske Spijkerman, PhD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems