ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Risk and Importance of Peroperative Nasal Hemorrhage in the Treatment of Lacrimal Duct Obstruction in Young Children (CANALHEMO)

F

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

Status

Completed

Conditions

Lacrimal Duct Obstruction

Treatments

Procedure: "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation

Study type

Observational

Funder types

NETWORK

Identifiers

NCT02851641
CEN_2015_9

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of the study is to evaluate the risk in intra-operative nasal hemorrhage when using a "pushed" probe (Master Ka) in the treatment of naso lacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO).

In the investigator's experience, this risk seemed to minus using a pushed probe rather than the classical pulled-type probes.

A lower risk of hemorrhage could lead to a change in the anesthetic procedure. The gold standard in NLDO is the use of an orotracheal intubation. It could then be replaced by the use of an orolaryngeal mask. A forthcoming study will evaluate the results of this anesthetic change.

Enrollment

108 patients

Sex

All

Ages

Under 6 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • < 6 years of age
  • Unilateral lacrimal duct obstruction with programmed surgery
  • Surgery scheduled wih a "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation
  • No opposition of parents for he participation of their child

Exclusion criteria

  • Coagulation disorder
  • Previous history of nasolacrimal intubation (homo or contra-lateral)
  • Non covered by health insurance

Trial design

108 participants in 1 patient group

Nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Treatment:
Procedure: "pushed" mono-canaliculonasal intubation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems