ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Risk of Re-Hospitalization in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Post Exacerbation

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) logo

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK)

Status

Completed

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Treatments

Drug: FSC
Drug: ACs

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

Details and patient eligibility

About

This retrospective database study will assess differences in the risk of re-hospitalization and other COPD-related exacerbations and costs for patients receiving fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate combination 250/50 (FSC) versus anticholinergics [i.e. tiotropium (TIO) and ipratropium or combination ipratropium-albuterol (collectively referred to as ipratropium - IPR)] post-hospitalization or Emergency Department (ED) visit for the treatment of COPD.

This is a hypotheses testing study. Associations are compared between FSC and AC cohorts.

Hypotheses for the primary outcome and key secondary outcomes are presented below:

Specifically the study hypotheses for the primary outcome being tested were:

Ho: There is no difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization between FSC and AC Ha: There is a difference in risk of COPD-related hospitalization between FSC and AC

Hypothesis for the key secondary outcome of COPD-related costs that was tested was:

Ho: There is no difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and AC Ha: There is a difference in COPD-related costs between FSC and AC

Full description

Managed care patients (aged >40 years) who were fluticasone propionate/salmeterol xinafoate combination (FSC)-naive in the 12 months pre-index period. The index-date was the date of discharge of the index Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)-related hospitalization/Emergency Department (ED) visit. Eligible patients were required to newly initiate or switch to drug therapy with FSC or ipratropium (IPR) / tiotropium (TIO) during the identification period (01/01/2004 to 01/31/2008) to treat COPD. Patients who switched to another maintenance medication or had an exacerbation in the treatment assessment period (30-days post-index date) were excluded from the study. Follow-up period was 12 months post treatment assessment period. Patients classified as being on FSC 250/50 versus anticholinergics (TIO, IP or IPR). Examined risk of COPD-related exacerbations such as hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, COPD-related physician/outpatient visit with oral corticosteroid (OCS) or antibiotic prescription (ABX) within 5 days of physician/outpatient visit and COPD-related medical, pharmacy, and total healthcare costs in follow-up period.

Enrollment

1,936 patients

Sex

All

Ages

40+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥40 years of age at index discharge date
  • Continuous health plan eligibility in the pre-index, treatment assessment, and follow-up periods
  • Absence of other fluticasone propionate -salmeterol xinafoate doses or combination product of budesonide-formoterol anytime during pre-index, treatment assessment, and follow-up periods

Exclusion criteria

  • COPD-related exacerbation during the treatment assessment period
  • Any therapy change, which was defined as switching or augmenting index therapy during treatment assessment period
  • Absence of comorbid conditions (respiratory cancer, cystic fibrosis, fibrosis due to tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, pneumonociosis, pulmonary fibrosis, pulmonary tuberculosis, and sarcoidosis) during the pre-index, treatment assessment, and follow-up periods

Trial design

1,936 participants in 1 patient group

COPD patients receiving pharmacotherapy
Description:
COPD patients age 40 years and older receiving pharmacotherapy to treat their COPD and an index event of COPD hospitalization or ER visit.
Treatment:
Drug: ACs
Drug: FSC

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems