Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without SLE (RISAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase IIb, non-inferiority proof of principle trial.
40 patients will be randomised with a ratio of 1:1 to receive either:
The primary outcome of the trial is the rate of change in brain white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume between baseline and 24 months follow up, assessed on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a surrogate marker of ischaemic damage.
Full description
The RISAPS trial follows on from the RAPS (Rivaroxaban in Antiphospholipid Syndrome) study that showed that rivaroxaban could offer a potentially effective alternative to warfarin for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) who have thrombosis (blood clots) in their veins, rather than in their arteries and require standard intensity anticoagulation (blood thinning).
Currently, APS patients who have had an ischaemic stroke (which occurs when blood flow to an area of brain is cut off) are treated with warfarin to reduce the risk of a recurrence. Warfarin tends to have a variable 'blood thinning' effect in patients with APS, necessitating frequent (usually weekly) INR blood tests to monitor the effect of the warfarin, which is inconvenient for patients.
The RISAPS trial will compare higher intensity (higher dose) rivaroxaban versus higher intensity warfarin (current standard of care treatment) for 24 months, in APS patients, with or without lupus (systemic lupus erythematosus; SLE), requiring higher intensity anticoagulation after experiencing a stroke, a 'mini stroke' (also known as a transient ischaemic attack) or other ischaemic brain damage (caused by blood clots in the brain arteries or smaller blood vessels). When compared with warfarin, a dvantages of rivaroxaban include, fixed dose prescribing and no need for monitoring of anticoagulant effect.
Furthermore, rivaroxaban has fewer drug-food interactions, and significantly fewer drug-drug interactions than warfarin. If rivaroxaban is no worse than warfarin for anticoagulation of APS patients with stroke or other ischaemic brain manifestations, it could become the standard of care for the treatment of APS patients, with or without lupus, who have experienced stroke or other ischaemic brain manifestations and improve patients' quality of life.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Patients who are triple positive for antiphospholipid antibodies (presence of lupus anticoagulant, IgG and/or IgM anticardiolipin and anti beta 2 glycoprotein I antibodies at >40 GPL or MPL units or > the 99th centile of normal*.
(*patients who have previously been triple aPL-positive and have single or double aPL positivity on at least 2 occasions over at least 6 months, including once within 1 month prior to randomisation, can be recruited to the trial)
Pregnant or lactating women
Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min (i.e. 29 mL/min or less)
Liver function tests ALT > 3 x ULN
Cirrhotic patients with Child Pugh B or C
Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 75 x 109/L)
Non-adherence on warfarin (based on clinical assessment)
Patients taking strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-gp pathways such as
Patients on strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or St. John's Wort)
Patients on dronedarone
Patients on levetiracetam, sodium valproate/valproic acid, oxcarbazepine or topiramate
Patients less than 18 years of age
Refusal to consent to the site informing General Practitioner (GP) and Healthcare Professional responsible for anticoagulation care of the participant.
Contraindications to MRI (e.g. cardiac pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, inability to lie flat: patients who do not meet local safety rules for MRI).
Patients at high risk of bleeding and not suitable for anticoagulation therapy.
Previous known allergy or intolerance to warfarin or rivaroxaban.
Women planning to become pregnant within the 2-year follow-up period.
Patients with known galactose intolerance, total lactase deficiency or galactose malabsorption.
Patients who have had active cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) within the last 2 years
Any other reason that the PI or delegate considers would make the patient unsuitable to enter RISAPS.
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
43 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
RISAPS Trial Manager
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal