Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
The primary objective of the Short Run AF study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long term anticoagulation with rivaroxaban against standard of care (SOC) in patients with ESVEA and CHA2DS2VASC score ≥3 on the incidence of ischemic stroke and peripheral embolism after 2 years follow-up and the occurrence of major bleeding events.
The primary efficacy endpoint is the first ischemic stroke or peripheral embolism detected clinically and on systematic cerebral MRIs in a time-to-event analysis.
The primary safety outcome is major bleeding at any site in the body according to the criteria of the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH)(23-25).
Full description
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) (> 30 consecutive seconds of arrhythmia) and high risk embolism meaning CHA2DS2VASC score ≥2 are candidate for long term oral anticoagulation. In addition, patients with excessive supraventricular ectopies or short atrial runs (ESVEA) but no documented AF are also at higher risk of systemic embolism compared to normal population. ESVEA is a frequent clinical situation observed approximately in up to 15% on systematic 24-hour Holter ECG in patients over 65 years old with cardiovascular risk factors. In addition, it is associated with a higher risk of peripheral arterial thromboembolism. However, it remains unclear if this former population could benefit from long-term oral anticoagulation.
To date no other studies have evaluated the effect of anticoagulation for patients with excessive atrial ectopies or short atrial runs. Also, to our knowledge, no study evaluating this problematic is ongoing. This population is actually not treated but in real clinical practice, patients with high CHA2DS2VASC score presenting with ESVEA could be candidate for oral anticoagulation. If it is demonstrated that patients with ESVEA and CHA2DS2VASC score ≥ 3 could benefit from oral anticoagulation and particularly new oral anticoagulants, it would change the everyday practice of cardiologist or gerontologist.
Our hypothesis is that long term anticoagulation with rivaroxaban could reduce drastically (50%, comparable with its effect during AF) the incidence of stroke or other thromboembolism events compared to standard of care (SOC), with a possible but moderate increased risk of bleeding compared to SOC that should remain acceptable compared to the reduction of stroke (net clinical benefit).
In this study, the study also attempt to describe the clinical course of patients with ESVEA in terms of global cardiovascular events, occurrence of documented atrial fibrillation or cognitive decline with an everyday practice follow-up.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
According to the SmPC, any contraindication to Rivaroxaban (particularly patients with ongoing major bleeding, vascular complication, prior haemorrhagic stroke or over recent stroke) or one of its excipients.
Inability to perform cerebral MRI
Life expectancy <24 months
History of major hemorrhage after taking Rivaroxaban
Documented atrial fibrillation or any other indication for oral anticoagulation
Patients with previous documented AF
Valvular congenital heart disease
Anticoagulant agents in the month prior to the inclusion visit
Acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) or in the past 30 days
Requires long-term antiplatelet therapy other than aspirin (i.e., patient requires any platelet aggregation inhibitor in addition to study treatment, in particular, the combination of two platelet aggregation inhibitors)
Ongoing need for strong inhibitors of both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (e.g., ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir or clarithromycin)
Ongoing need for strong inducers of both CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein (e.g., rifampin, carbamazepine, phenytoin)
Participants considered by the investigator to be unsuitable for the study for any of the following reasons:Patient refuse the treatment with rivaroxaban or anticipated to have poor compliance on study drug treatment or Unwilling to attend study follow-up visits
Cancer or other life threatening conditions
Severe, disabling stroke within the previous 6 months, or any stroke within the previous 14 days
Conditions associated with an increased risk of bleeding:
Severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance <30 mL/min or less)
Active infective endocarditis
Active liver disease, including but not limited to, associated or not with coagulopathy and a clinically significant risk of bleeding, including cirrhotic patients with a Child Pugh class B or C score.
Persistent ALT, AST, Alk Phos greater than twice the upper limit of the normal range
Known active hepatitis C (positive HCV RNA)
Known active hepatitis B (HBs antigen +, anti HBc IgM +)
Known active hepatitis A
Anemia (hemoglobin level less than 110 g/L) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 150 X 109/L)
Patients who have received an investigational drug in the past 30 days
Patients considered unreliable by the investigator, or having any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would not allow safe participation in the study (e.g., drug addiction, alcohol abuse)
Patient with cardiac prosthetic devices : Reveal, pace-maker, automatic implantable defibrillator
Participation in another interventional clinical trial
Patient on AME (state medical aid)
Persons under psychiatric care
Adults subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship and safeguard of justice)Patients deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
550 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
wafa fethallah; Nicolas LELLOUCHE, MD, PhD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal