ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Robotic-Assisted or Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer With or Without Left Colic Artery Preservation

N

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

Status

Completed

Conditions

Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
Left Colic Artery Stenosis (Diagnosis)
Rectal Cancer

Treatments

Procedure: with or without Left Colic Artery Preservation

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06376227
jamesdukeryan

Details and patient eligibility

About

Brief Summary

Background The preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) during rectal cancer resection remains a topic of controversy, and there is a notable absence of robust evidence regarding the outcomes associated with LCA preservation. And the advantages of robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) surgery in rectal resection remain uncertain. The objective of this study was to assess the influence of LCA preservation surgery and RAL surgery on intraoperative and postoperative complications of rectal cancer resection.

Methods Participants who underwent laparoscopic (LSC) or RAL with or without LCA preservation resection for rectal cancer between April 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively assessed. The patients were categorized into two groups: low ligation (LL) which with preservation of LCA and high ligation (HL) which without preservation of LCA. A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis was performed to decrease confounding. The primary outcome was operative findings, operative morbidity, and postoperative genitourinary function.

Full description

The investigators retrospectively collected data from the medical records of participants who had rectal cancer at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, from April 2020 to May 2023. A total of 612 from 1164 cases were included in this study; in 462 cases, the LCA was preserved by LL intraoperatively (LL group), in which 202 cases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (LL-RAL subgroup) and 260 cases underwent laparoscopy (LL-LSC subgroup). While in the remaining 150 cases, the LCA was not preserved by HL intraoperatively (HL group). in which 70 cases underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopy (HL-RAL subgroup) and 80 cases underwent laparoscopy (HL-LSC subgroup).

Enrollment

1,164 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 75 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Low anterior resection for rectal cancer
  • Postoperative pathological diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma
  • Informed consent signed prior to surgery.

Exclusion criteria

  • Recurrent rectal cancer
  • Emergency surgery
  • Preoperative and intraoperative detection of distant organ metastases or extensive
  • Implantation metastases in the abdominal cavity
  • Palliative surgery
  • A postoperative pathology report that showed residual cancer cells at the proximal or distal resection margin
  • No standard chemotherapy for tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging II or III after surgery
  • Synchronous colorectal carcinoma and other organ tumors
  • Incomplete case data.

Trial design

1,164 participants in 2 patient groups

with or without Left Colic Artery Preservation
low ligation (LL) group and high ligation (HL) group
Description:
low ligation (LL) which with preservation of LCA and high ligation (HL) which without preservation of LCA
Treatment:
Procedure: with or without Left Colic Artery Preservation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems