ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

ROP Screening: Comparison of Pain Using Two Eyelid Retractors

Wake Forest University (WFU) logo

Wake Forest University (WFU)

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Pain During ROP Exam

Treatments

Procedure: ROP exam with spring loaded retractor
Procedure: ROP exam with screw retractor

Study type

Observational

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02152046
K5900211
5823 (Other Identifier)
IRB00106968

Details and patient eligibility

About

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of blindness in the world. Initial ocular examinations of infants at risk for ROP are generally conducted between 4-6 weeks postnatally. These exams are vital to protect preterm infants from blindness, but these exams have been shown to cause pain in this population.

Currently two speculums are utilized; the spring loaded Alfonso and the screw loaded Cook eyelid speculum. There is no schedule for who receives which speculum during their exam.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the pain response in the neonatal population, 32 weeks or less, and less than or equal to 1500 grams, undergoing a retractor eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening.

The primary study aim is to compare the N-PASS pain score between neonates who received a ROP eye exam with the spring loaded Alfonso and the screw loaded Cook eye speculums.

Full description

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a major cause of blindness in the world. It is a vasoproliferative retinopathy that affects premature and low birth-weight infants. Initial ocular examinations of infants at risk for ROP are generally conducted between 4-6 weeks postnatally. These exams are vital to protect preterm infants from blindness, but these exams have been shown to cause pain in this population.

Only two studies alluded to the impact of the eyelid speculum on the pain response and score. Specifically, Hered and Gyland, questioned whether the Alfonso, spring loaded, eyelid lid speculum due to its forceful opening of the eyelid causes more pain. However, no studies were found that included the type of eyelid speculum as a variable of study. In addition, no studies have compared the effect of different eyelid speculums on the pain response.

Currently two speculums are utilized; the spring loaded Alfonso and the screw loaded Cook eyelid speculum. There is no schedule for who receives which speculum during their exam. The investigators team recognizes that the insertion of the eyelid speculum causes a pain response in these infants and would like to determine if there is a difference in the level of that response between the two speculums.

The investigators study will test the difference in pain response when using either a spring loaded eyelid speculum or screw loaded speculum during an ROP exam on premature infants.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the pain response in the neonatal population, 32 weeks or less, and less than or equal to 1500 grams, undergoing a retractor eye exam for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening.

The primary study aim is to compare the N-PASS pain score between neonates who received a ROP eye exam with the spring loaded Alfonso and the screw loaded Cook eye speculums.

Enrollment

44 patients

Sex

All

Ages

23 to 37 weeks old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Neonates who are born at less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation or are less than or equal to 1500 grams birth weight

Exclusion criteria

  • Neonates who are paralyzed or have a negative pain score
  • Neonates undergoing an Avastin injection
  • Neonates undergoing a Retcam exam
  • Neonates transferred to another unit

Trial design

44 participants in 2 patient groups

Spring loaded retractor
Description:
The Alfonso Eyelid Speculum, newborn size
Treatment:
Procedure: ROP exam with spring loaded retractor
Screw retractor
Description:
Cook Eyelid Speculum, infant size
Treatment:
Procedure: ROP exam with screw retractor

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems