Safety and Efficacy of Implantable Collamer Lens Versus Implantable Phakic Lens IPCL in Myopic Patients; A Comparative Study

Al-Azhar University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Myopia

Treatments: Procedure: Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL); Procedure: Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06058780

ICL vs IPCL

Details and patient eligibility

About

Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOL) have proven to be a great alternative to corneal refractive surgery in certain situations. They offer several advantages over corneal techniques, such as being suitable for high myopes and causing relatively fewer higher-order aberrations. In addition, pIOLs have been shown to provide better retinal image magnification and higher contrast sensitivity compared to laser in situ keratomileusis, regardless of whether the myopia is low or high.

Enrollment: 200 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 20 to 25 years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• myopia of more than 6 diopter

Exclusion criteria

• unstable refraction
• unstable refraction

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

200 participants in 2 patient groups

Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL)

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Procedure: Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL)

Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL)

Active Comparator group

Treatment:

Procedure: Implantable Intraocular Lens (IPCL)