Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous CXA 101 and comparator in complicated urinary tract infection
Full description
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, comparative efficacy and safety study of IV CXA 101 versus IV ceftazidime for 7 to 10 days.
Subjects are followed up 6 to 9 days after the last dose of study drug to assess clinical signs and symptoms of infection. A Late Follow Up evaluation (21 to 28 days after the last dose of study drug) occurs for those subjects who respond to therapy. The primary assessment of effectiveness is the microbiological response (the eradication at post-therapy of the infectious organism identified at the start of study). An additional assessment of efficacy includes the overall clinical response, which is described as cured, improved, or failed. Safety assessments include the incidence of adverse events throughout the study, clinical laboratory tests (hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis) and physical examinations at the start of the study and post-therapy.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Males and females 18 to 90 years of age, inclusive.
Pyuria (white blood cell [WBC] count > 10/µL in unspun urine or ≥ 10 per high power field in spun urine)
Clinical signs and/or symptoms of cUTI, either of:
a. Pyelonephritis, as indicated by both of the following: i. Fever (oral temperature ≥ 37.8°C); ii. Flank pain or costovertebral angle tenderness;
OR
b. Complicated lower UTI, as indicated by both of the following: i. At least one of the following new or worsening symptoms:
ii. At least one of the following complicating factors:
Exclusion Criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
129 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal