ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Safety and Efficacy of Pasireotide Long Acting Release (LAR) vs. Octreotide LAR in Patients With Active Acromegaly

Novartis logo

Novartis

Status and phase

Completed
Phase 3

Conditions

Acromegaly

Treatments

Drug: Octreotide
Drug: Pasireotide

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Industry

Identifiers

NCT00600886
CSOM230C2305
2007-001972-36 (EudraCT Number)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The patients received either Pasireotide LAR or Octreotide LAR for one year of treatment.

The objective of this study was to compare the proportion of patients with a reduction of mean GH level to <2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) between the two treatment groups (pasireotide LAR and octreotide LAR) at 12 months.

Following one year of treatment patients could proceed into the study extension.

Patients who did not respond to the treatment they were randomized to (based on month 12 assessment results) were switched to the other treatment arm at month 13.

Enrollment

358 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with active acromegaly (based on elevated GH and IGF-1 levels)
  • Patients who have undergone one or more pituitary surgeries, but have not been treated medically, or de-novo patients presenting a visible pituitary adenoma on MRI and who refuse pituitary surgery or for whom pituitary surgery is contraindicated
  • Patients for whom written informed consent to participate in the study has been obtained prior to any study related activity

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who are being or were treated with octreotide, lanreotide, dopamine agonists or GH antagonists with the exception of a single dose of short-acting octrotide or short-acting dopamine agonists. In case of a single dose of short-acting octrotide, the dose should not be used to predict the response to the octretide treatment. The single dose of short-acting octreotide or short-acting dopamine agonists should not be administered in the 3 days prior to randomization
  • Patients with compression of the optic chiasm causing any visual field defect
  • Patients who have received pituitary irradiation within the last ten years prior to visit 1
  • Poorly controlled diabetic patients

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Triple Blind

358 participants in 2 patient groups

Pasireotide LAR
Experimental group
Description:
Patients in this arm received Pasireotide LAR 40 mg im depot injection, blinded, once every 28 days (± 2 days) for 12 months. Dose could be down- or up-titrated to 20 or 60 mg, respectively. Patients who responded to Pasireotide LAR (i.e. the randomized treatment) at the end of the core (Month 12), continued Pasireotide LAR treatment in the extension. Patients who did not respond to Pasireotide LAR at the end of the core (Month 12) were allowed to switch to receive Octreotide LAR in the extension.
Treatment:
Drug: Pasireotide
Octreotide LAR
Active Comparator group
Description:
Patients in this arm received Octreotide LAR 20 mg im depot injection, blinded, once every 28 days (± 2 days) for 12 months. Dose could be down- or up-titrated to 10 or 30 mg, respectively. Patients who responded to Octreotide LAR (i.e. the randomized treatment) at the end of the core (Month 12) continued Octreotide LAR treatment in the extension (up to 2 years of treatment). Patients who did not respond to Octreotide LAR at the end of the core (Month 12) were allowed to switch to receive Pasireotide LAR in the extension.
Treatment:
Drug: Octreotide

Trial contacts and locations

95

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems