Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Implant anchorage is difficult in patient with osteoporotic bone. To improve the implant bone interface, the ISS stabilization system has been developed. The goal of the study is to investigate the efficacy the ISS augmentation compared to the standard PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in the treatment of patients suffering from osteoporotic/osteopenic thoracolumbar fracture.
The study has two phases, a pilot phase followed by a pivotal phase. The data will be used to measure clinical and radiological performance and usability of both systems.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Patient
Age ≥ 50 and ≤ 85, male and female patients
Subject is able to understand the risks and benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent.
Psychosocially, mentally and physically able to fully comply with the protocol requirements for the duration of the study including adhering to scheduled visits, treatment plan, completing forms and other study procedures.
Fracture
Fractures between the 10th thoracic and 4th lumbar vertebra, both included
Bone mineral density equal or above the threshold of 60 mgHA/ccm (central assessment of the screening qCT scan).
Fractures with the indication and possibility for augmented bi-segmental dorsal pedicle screw and rod stabilization including kyphoplasty in the broken vertebra
All fractures where pedicle screws can be used
Exclusion criteria
Patient
Substance use disorders (incl. tobacco abuse >20 cigarettes/day) and alcohol abuse disorders within the last 2 years before randomization.
BMI > 35
Permanent or progressive neurologic deficits (incl. upper motor neuron disease and myelopathy)
Known Creutzfeldt Jacob Disease
Systemic infections:
Rheumatoid arthritis or known disorders of bone metabolism (excl. osteopenia/osteoporosis, Vitamin D deficiency)
Radiation therapy of the spine in medical history
Contraindications to pedicle screw and rod stabilization
Breast feeding, pregnancy or child-bearing potential (female patients of childbearing potential and male patients with a partner of child bearing potential must agree to use a highly effective contraceptive method).
A compromised immune system or a therapy with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants
Active malignancy or history of malignancy (excl. Basalioma as a semi-malignant tumor) <2 years ago from time of randomization
Known allergy to any component of the investigational device
History of severe allergy, anaphylactic reactions and hypersensitivity reactions experienced in previous surgical interventions.
Other concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical conditions (e.g. insufficiently treated diabetes (HbA1c > 8 %), active or uncontrolled infection) that could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise compliance with the protocol
Participation in other clinical investigations for drugs or devices
Fracture
Fracture age > 3 months
Major surgery to the spine planned for at least 12 months following enrolment
Any treatment of the fracture other than that specified in the inclusion criteria (e.g. index screws in the fractured vertebra, vertebroplasty, additional ventral stabilization)
Severe spinal deformations or fusion at the target vertebral or adjacent segments
Previous operations at the spine in the target or adjacent vertebrae
Infections or inflammatory processes at vertebral bodies
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
2 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Leanna Caron
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal