Status and phase
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study evaluated the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of d-methadone in a limited dose range, in single administrations in humans.
Full description
This was a phase 1, single-center study carried out in healthy male and female subjects to investigate the safety, tolerability, and PK of d-methadone. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 6 sequential cohorts of healthy subjects. Single oral doses of d-methadone were investigated in sequential cohorts. The proposed doses were 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg. The decision to enroll the sequential cohort at the next dose level was based on the safety data and available PK data from previous doses. Dose escalation depended on the emergence of dose-limiting AEs and review of the safety data. Progression to the next higher dose only occurred if the previous dose level was deemed to be safe and well tolerated by the investigator, safety review team, and sponsor. Of the 8 subjects in each cohort, 2 subjects received placebo and 6 subjects received d-methadone.
Subjects were admitted the day prior to receiving the study drug and remained in the clinical research unit (CRU) under clinical supervision for at least 72 hours post-dose. At the discretion of the investigator or designee, the confinement time could have been extended to ensure the safety of each subject. Visits 3 and 4 were follow-up visits approximately 6±2 days and 10±2 days, respectively, after drug administration.
Based on the blinded safety data from Cohorts 1 to 4, single doses of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, and 100 mg of d-methadone or placebo were well tolerated and there were no dose-limiting AEs.
During all cohorts, subjects were evaluated for safety (AEs, vital signs, electrocardiograms [ECGs], cardiac telemetry, pulse oximetry, clinical laboratory tests), tolerability, and PK. The following signs of opioid toxicity were deemed to be of special interest:
Original terms used to identify AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 17.1. The number and percentage of subjects with treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized by system organ class, preferred term, and treatment and for each treatment by maximum intensity and maximum relationship to study treatment.
Descriptive statistics for vital signs were calculated and presented for each time point by treatment (absolute values and change from baseline). ECG results (absolute values and change from baseline [average of triplicate assessments, where applicable]) were summarized using descriptive statistics; frequencies (numbers and percentages) were calculated for the overall evaluation by scheduled time and treatment. Laboratory data were summarized by the type of test and scheduled visit. Descriptive statistics and number of subjects with laboratory test results below, within, and above normal ranges were tabulated by scheduled time. Abnormal findings in laboratory data were listed with a flag for clinical significance. Medical history abnormalities were coded to MedDRA terms. Physical examination abnormalities were also listed. The original verbatim terms for concomitant medications were coded into drug class and preferred term. These data were listed.
Pharmacokinetic Analysis The PK parameters for d-methadone determined by non-compartmental analysis were summarized by dose. Graphs of concentration (linear and log-linear) vs time were generated. Descriptive statistics were calculated by dose and time point for all d-methadone concentrations. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ) were set to zero for the generation of summary statistics and mean concentration-time plots.
For the calculation of the PK parameters, concentration-time data were treated as follows: BLQ concentrations prior to the first quantifiable concentration were set to zero; BLQ concentrations after the first quantifiable concentration were treated as missing; pre-dose sampling times relative to dosing were set to zero. Descriptive statistics were calculated by dose. The dose proportionality of Cmax and AUC was assessed by the Hummel method. Tmax and t½ for different doses were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis test to determine whether there was any difference among the treatment groups, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for contrasts.
Pharmacodynamic Analysis The PD data at each time point were summarized by descriptive statistics and presented graphically (as appropriate). Derived endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics.
Outliers were listed by measure and parameter. Pupillometry constriction was listed and grouped by dose and subject with descriptive statistics for changes from baseline for different time points.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
42 participants in 6 patient groups, including a placebo group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal