Saline Enema Administration in Meconium Obstruction of Prematurity and Impact on the Resolution, Feeds, Microbiome, and Gut-brain Axis.

KK Women's and Children's Hospital

Status: Enrolling

Conditions: Meconium Obstruction of Prematurity

Treatments: Drug: Glycerin Suppository; Procedure: Saline Enema (SE)

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT06048614

2023/2270

Details and patient eligibility

About

The goal of this clinical trial is to study the effect of twice-daily saline enema (SE) in the treatment obstruction of prematurity (MOP) in infants with the birth weight ≤1.25kg. The main questions, the trial aims to answer are

1. To validate the finding of our pilot study which had shown that twice-daily SE reduces the time to reach full enteral feeds in premature infant as compared to premature infant treated with Glycerine Suppository (GS), in a larger cohort. Infant with MOP fails to pass meconium in the first 48 hours of life and develop symptoms and signs like abdominal distension and feed intolerance.

2. The other aims of this study are to test whether the intervention is

   1. Effective treatment for MOP
   2. Reduce the duration of ICU stay
   3. Reduce the rate of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) days and number of intravenous catheter days

3. The study also wants to explore the impact of this intervention on the gut microbiome, gut-brain interaction and immune response of the new-born.

Full description

Very low birth weight infants (VLBW ≤ 1.5 kg) constitute more than 60% of bed occupancy in level III neonatal units. They face the risk of 10-50% long-term disability, and their initial healthcare cost ranges from S$50,000 to 1 million, an important healthcare issue.

The incidence of meconium obstruction of prematurity (MOP) is 20-30% in extremely low birth weight (ELBW ≤ 1 kg) infants. The intervention based on the current standard of care increase the risk of laparotomy necrotizing enterocolitis, intestinal perforation, and neurodevelopmental risks posed by general anaesthesia. Our published pilot RCT demonstrated that saline enema (SE) is an effective, feasible, and safe intervention to reduce the time to reach full enteral feeds and is a potentially effective treatment for MOP in ELBW (< 1 kg) infants.

Our primary hypothesis is that Infants with Twice-daily high-volume SE (20-40 ml/kg/day) intervention will result in reduced time to reach full enteral feeds compared to infants treated with conventional management with Glycerin suppository (GS) in (≤1.25kg) infants with MOP. Our exploratory hypothesis is that SE will have a protective effect on the gut microbiome, inflammatory and immune response in preterm infants.

Ninety-five infants born over three years in KK Hospital (KKH) and Singapore General Hospital (SGH) will be enrolled and randomized at 48 hours or later to receive SE or GS. The standardized protocol will be used for the accreditation and administration of SE. Primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes data, including treatment failure data, will be recorded. Infants will be followed up to 36 weeks of gestation or discharge, whichever is earlier. Maternal and infant characteristics, inflammatory and immune response, and safety outcome data will be collected.

If the findings of our pilot trial are confirmed, the protocol can become the standard of care in preterm infants with MOP. Additionally, significant healthcare cost savings will be realized alongside an improved understanding of the Microbiome, immune and inflammatory response pertaining to the gut.

Enrollment: 95 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 1 day to 36 weeks old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Criteria A: For infant presenting with early onset of MOP

  1. Birth weight 500 - 1250 gram
  2. ≥ 23 weeks gestation
  3. No BO for 48 hours
  4. BO present but with a small amount or stain of meconium
  5. Feeds intolerance or abdominal X-ray showing dilated loops of bowel

• Criteria B: For infant presenting with Late onset of MOP

  1. Birth weight 500 - 1250 gram
  2. ≥ 23 weeks gestation
  3. Infants who passed meconium initially and develop evidence of meconium obstruction at a later age (feed intolerance or vomiting and abnormal abdominal X-ray with or without abdominal distension)

Exclusion criteria

Infants that:

1. Neuromuscular disorder
2. Moderate or severe asphyxia
3. Inability to start enteral feeding, which continued for 3 consecutive days before 2 weeks of post-natal age for reasons unrelated to meconium inspissation or its complication
4. Without parental consent
5. Aggravated medical instability
6. Single mothers < 21 years

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

95 participants in 2 patient groups

Intervention Arm (Saline Enema Arm)

Experimental group

Description:

After randomisation, infant who allocated with intervention group will proceed with SE with normal saline (20-40ml/kg twice daily) earliest at 48 to 72 hours of age. Then continue until 2 days of yellow stools/ 110ml/kg/day of oral feeds; whichever is earlier. SE are recommended if baby do not do bowel opening (BO) for 2 days before reaching full feeds

Treatment:

Procedure: Saline Enema (SE)

Control Arm (Glycerin Suppository Arm)

Active Comparator group

Description:

Infants randomized to GS received the standard management protocol for meconium retention in the unit. GS (2,000 mg, a quarter unit, four doses 12 h apart) were administered to infants earliest at 48 hour to 72 hours of birth, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team. Infants who were diagnosed with meconium obstruction later in the first 2 weeks of life were also treated with glycerin suppositories for 48 hrs, with subsequent once-daily GS being administered at the discretion of the managing team. Infants who failed to respond to glycerin suppositories were referred to the surgical team by the managing team The subsequent management of meconium retention was at the surgeon's discretion and included continued GS by the surgical team, contrast enema or surgical interventions performed in escalating order as mentioned.

Treatment:

Drug: Glycerin Suppository