ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

SCS for Patient With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy and Peripheral Arterial Disease

University of Nebraska logo

University of Nebraska

Status

Begins enrollment in 1 month

Conditions

Chronic Pain Syndrome
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Limb Pain
Chronic Pain
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Peripheral Arterial Disease

Treatments

Device: Sham stimulation
Device: Spinal cord stimulation

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
Industry

Identifiers

NCT06480786
0623-24-FB

Details and patient eligibility

About

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 230 million adults worldwide and is a highly morbid, costly, and disabling condition. Ischemic leg pain drives disability in PAD patients and results from oxygen supply-demand mismatch, autonomic dysfunction, and muscle breakdown. This leg pain, which is unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy, limits the patient's tolerance to exercise, which is an important disease-modifying intervention. Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for medically intractable pain, including painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and ischemic pain, but is not part of the standard-of-care for PAD despite limited promising clinical data. Early studies used first-generation, tonic stimulation devices, but with these it was impossible to perform sham-controlled trials to test the treatment. Since then, new types of waveform treatments, including high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS), have been shown to be more effective in the treatment of intractable pain. While high-frequency SCS is approved for PDN treatment, it has never been tested in the treatment of claudication pain from PAD.

This study will enroll up to 15 participants between the ages of 19 and 89 who have PAD and PDN and are successfully implanted with a permanent SCS. Twelve weeks after SCS implantation, participants will receive two weeks of stimulation and two weeks of sham intervention, in random starting order. Blood flow, blood pressure, skin oxygen levels, and participant reported pain int the lower extremities will be assessed before SCS implantation, 12 weeks after SCS implantation and during each of the treatment periods. Participants will also complete a quality of life survey at the same time points. Comparisons of these measurements with the baseline and post-implantation measurements to determine the effects of SCS.

Full description

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 230 million adults worldwide and is a highly morbid, costly, and disabling condition. Ischemic leg pain drives disability in PAD patients and results from oxygen supply-demand mismatch, autonomic dysfunction, and muscle breakdown. This leg pain, which is unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy, limits the patient's tolerance to exercise, which is an important disease-modifying intervention. Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for medically intractable pain, including painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and ischemic pain, but is not part of the standard-of-care for PAD despite limited promising clinical data. Early studies used first-generation, tonic stimulation devices, but with these it was impossible to perform sham-controlled trials to test the treatment. Since then, new types of waveform treatments, including high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS), have been shown to be more effective in the treatment of intractable pain. While high-frequency SCS is approved for PDN treatment, it has never been tested in the treatment of claudication pain from PAD.

This study will enroll up to 15 participants between the ages of 19 and 89 who have PAD (ankle-brachial index under 0.90 or vascular imaging, and experience pain from walking with a pain level of at least 6 cm for at least 3 months )and PDN and who meet inclusion criteria for permanent spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement. Participants must also have diabetes with symptoms of neuropathy, have a starting pain level of at least 5 cm on a visual pain scale and Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire score of 5.5 or less.

The study begins with an initial evaluation visit, then a follow-up visit 12 weeks after permanent SCS implantation and optimization. Participants will then be randomized to start in the SCS group or the sham intervention group. Each of these interventions will be conducted for two weeks, then participants will switch to the other intervention in a cross over design. Blood flow, blood pressure, skin oxygen levels, and participant reported pain int the lower extremities will be assessed before SCS implantation, 12 weeks after SCS implantation and during each of the treatment periods. Participants will also complete a quality of life survey at the same time points. Comparisons of these measurements with the baseline and post-implantation measurements to determine the effects of SCS. The study intervention lasts for 4 weeks, after which participants will return to standard SCS care.

Enrollment

15 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

19 to 89 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • 19 years to 89 years old
  • Diagnosed diabetes mellitus
  • Signs or symptoms of neuropathy and maximum baseline visual-analog pain scale ≥ 5 cm and peripheral arterial disease (diagnosed by ankle-brachial index < 0.90 or vascular imaging studies) with claudication and exertion-induced visual-analog pain scale ≥ 6 cm for a minimum of 3 months
  • Successful spinal cord stimulator (SCS) trial (>50% relief of chronic lower extremity pain) and will have a new permanent SCS placed prior to study intervention

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncontrolled psychological or psychiatric disorder
  • Inability to hold antithrombotic therapy per the American Society of Regional Anesthesia guidelines
  • Non-healing wounds
  • Gangrene
  • Critical limb ischemia
  • Prior lower extremity amputation
  • Inability to adhere to study follow-up
  • Mechanical spine instability based on flexion/extension radiographs of the lumbar spine
  • Prior or current spinal cord stimulator implant

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

15 participants in 2 patient groups

Active Spinal Cord Stimulation
Experimental group
Description:
Therapeutic spinal cord stimulation titrated at 12 weeks post operative at standard clinical practice.
Treatment:
Device: Spinal cord stimulation
Sham Stimulation
Sham Comparator group
Description:
Sub-threshold low frequency spinal cord stimulation to provide no analgesic benefit but serve as a sham control.
Treatment:
Device: Sham stimulation

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Julia T Hoffman, MSN

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems