Second Study to Assess Different Ablation Strategies in Achieving Long-Term Arrhythmia Control in Patients With Persistent or Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (RASTA XT)

University of Pennsylvania

Status: Terminated

Conditions: Atrial Fibrillation

Treatments: Other: Pulmonary Vein Isolation procedure

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT02019238

818358 (Other Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) combined with empiric ablation of either common sites of non-PV triggers of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and locations that may sustain stable AF sources should be more efficacious than PVI combined with ablation of only documented non-PV triggers of AF in achieving long-term arrhythmia control in patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF.

Full description

The AF ablation procedure has evolved considerably and currently the most accepted technique involves creation of circumferential Radiofrequency Ablation lesions around PV ostia (encircling wide areas around the left and right sided veins). We have found that targeting areas outside the pulmonary veins that trigger atrial premature beats of AF is important for optimizing the success of AF ablation. The methodology of additional lesion creation remains non-uniform, lacks mechanistic insights, and there is paucity of prospective randomized comparison on the long term efficacy and safety of various lesion combinations in achieving AF control. Our group recently conducted randomized study (RASTA Trial) that compared PVI combined with ablation of documented non-PV triggers (standard AF ablation strategy) of AF to two other strategies i.e. 1. PVI combined with empiric ablation at common non-PV trigger sites of AF, 2. PVI combined with ablation of locations demonstrating complex fractionated electrograms. In this study comprising 156 subjects with persistent and/or long standing persistent AF, the investigators found that the standard AF ablation strategy was as efficacious as PVI combined with empiric ablation at common non-PV trigger sites of AF and both of these approaches were significantly better than PVI combined with ablation of locations demonstrating complex fractionated electrograms. Our study also showed that when compared to the standard AF ablation strategy (PVI combined with ablation of documented non PV AF triggers), PVI combined with empiric ablation at common locations of AF triggers in the left and right atria showed 22% higher odds of achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmias and 33% higher odds of achieving arrhythmia control at one year. Although this difference may have been clinically meaningful, it did not reach statistical significance because this study was powered to test for a difference of ≥30% between groups. Thus, in the current proposal the investigators hope to show statistical difference in the outcomes between these two strategies by increasing the sample size which will provide adequate power to show a 20% difference in the primary outcome. Also, the investigators hope to enhance the outcome in the study arm (PVI combined with empiric ablation at common locations of AF triggers) by also targeting empirically locations in the left and right atria that have been shown in recent studies to be focal sources and rotors that maintain AF.

Enrollment: 56 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• All patients of age ≥ 18 years, undergoing their first ablation procedure that meet American College of Cardiology / American Heart Association defined criteria for persistent or long standing persistent AF will be eligible to participate in the proposed study. This includes patients with a history of AF episodes lasting at least 7 days and requiring at least 2 cardioversions.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients with paroxysmal AF (self-terminating episodes lasting < 7 day)
• Patients who have had a previous AF ablation procedure
• Failure to obtain informed consent
• Patients < 18 years of age. Investigators will plan to exclude paroxysmal AF patients and concentrate on patients with persistent or long standing persistent AF who may require further ablation to achieve better outcomes. Patients who have undergone previous AF ablation procedure will be excluded since the prior methodology used may confound the results of this study.

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

56 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

Group 1-Standard PVI ablation

Placebo Comparator group

Description:

Pulmonary Vein Isolation procedure combined with ablation of documented non-PV triggers of AF

Treatment:

Other: Pulmonary Vein Isolation procedure

Group 2-PVI with empiric ablation

Active Comparator group

Description:

Pulmonary Vein Isolation procedure combined with empiric ablation of common sites of non-PV triggers of AF and locations that may sustain AF sources on long term arrhythmia control

Treatment:

Other: Pulmonary Vein Isolation procedure