Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This prospective, non-randomized controlled study aiming at comparing the prognosis of minimal invasive lens surgery and traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts after the patient receives secondary intraocular artificial lens (IOL) implantation.
Full description
Pediatric patients received minimal invasive surgery and traditional lens removal surgery (anterior capsulorhexis and irrigation/aspiration and posterior capsulorhexis and anterior vitrectomy) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to two groups according to the strategy of primary surgery: Group I: the participants received minimal invasive surgery, while in Group II, the participants received a traditional cataract surgery. Investigators perform a secondary intraocular lens implantation for the patients. Investigators compare the visual acuity, incidence of high intraocular pressure, incidence of visual axis opacification, uveitis and iris/pupil abnormality between two groups after the first and the second surgery, aiming at comparing the prognosis of minimal invasive lens surgery and traditional cataract surgery for treating congenital cataracts.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Age between 24 months and 72 months Uncomplicated congenital cataract and underwent cataract removal Informed consent signed by a parent or legal guardian
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
80 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jing Li, M.D
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal