ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) Therapies Trial

Indiana University logo

Indiana University

Status

Invitation-only

Conditions

Decision Making
Implementation Science
Bias, Sex
Bias, Racial
Heart Transplant
Health Equity

Treatments

Behavioral: SOCIAL HF

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT05390411
R01HL159216 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
R56HL159216 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
13943

Details and patient eligibility

About

The primary goal of this study is to assess real-world effectiveness and implementation of an evidence-based multi-component strategy to achieve equity in the allocation rate of advanced heart failure therapies, heart transplants and ventricular assist devices. This study proposes to implement evidence-based strategies that reduce bias, replace subjective evaluations with objective criteria, and improve group dynamics in a randomized cluster trial. This rigorously designed trial may inform national guidelines for advanced heart failure therapy allocation, and data are likely to be generalizable to other organ replacement treatments and advanced chronic disease decision-making processes.

Full description

Standardized protocols can reduce the impact of implicit bias but are underused. Since the Institute of Medicine's report, "Unequal Treatment", multiple studies have confirmed that standardization of decision- making processes reduces bias, but bias in the allocation of advanced therapies has not been addressed. Using an evidence-based framework for behavior change [Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation for Behavior Change/Behavior Change Wheel (COM-B/BCW)], a standardized protocol strategy Seeking Objectivity in Allocation of Advanced Heart Failure (SOCIAL HF) was developed, that addresses significant barriers to equity in advanced therapies:1) bias, 2) subjectivity in evaluation of social support and adherence, and 3) poor group dynamics. Thus, SOCIAL HF includes: 1) evidence-based bias training tailored for HF, 2) restriction to objective evaluations of social support and adherence, and 3) environmental restructuring and modeling of meeting settings to include anonymous electronic voting and equitable seating arrangement. In complex decision-making that includes individuals and groups, the standardized protocol strategy, SOCIAL HF, has the greatest likelihood of achieving health equity in advanced HF. The goal is to assess real-world effectiveness (Aim 1) and implementation (Aim 2) of SOCIAL HF for allocation of advanced HF therapies, heart transplant and ventricular assist device implantation. A randomized controlled cluster design will be used to test the effectiveness of SOCIAL HF strategy. Investigators will evaluate Implementation of SOCIAL HF across study sites using mixed-methods in order to learn optimal implementation strategies to achieve equity. Investigators will use normalization process theory to evaluate how SOCIAL HF affects processes and outcomes important to advanced HF centers (e.g. fidelity/variation). Investigators will use RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) to evaluate factors that promote reach and adoption and resources needed for implementation.

Enrollment

1,463 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  1. Active United Network for Organ Sharing heart transplant and ventricular assist device center
  2. Centers that routinely evaluate at least 50 minoritized racial/ethnic patients and 50 women for advanced heart failure therapies (heart transplant and ventricular assist device) over 2 years
  3. Advanced therapy professionals from participating centers (i.e., coordinators, physicians, pharmacists, nurses, social workers)
  4. Participants for the interview portion will be a subset of otherwise eligible advanced therapy professionals who are included on selection meeting attendance sheets at an included center

Exclusion criteria

  1. Centers unable to fully participate in the training and evaluation measures
  2. If the center ceases to be an active heart failure/transplant center

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

1,463 participants in 2 patient groups

Control Sites
No Intervention group
Description:
No Intervention
Sites Randomized to SOCIAL HF
Experimental group
Description:
SOCIAL HF is composed of evidence-based bias reduction training, employment of objective measures of social support, and changes to facilitate group dynamics.
Treatment:
Behavioral: SOCIAL HF

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2024 Veeva Systems