Self-compassion and Self-criticism: a Virtual Reality Intervention (VirtuS)

University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)

Status: Completed

Conditions: Self-Criticism

Treatments: Behavioral: Self-criticism avatar; Behavioral: Double Standards

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05887141

10036 (Registry Identifier)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to investigate two independent Virtual Reality interventions for self-criticism and self-compassion and the use of perspective-change in these interventions.

Full description

The current study will use two novel Virtual Reality (VR) exercises that will be investigated through two independent sub-studies. First of all, an exercise that uses the CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) technique called 'Double standards'. People with excessive self-criticism often set higher standards for themselves, which makes them more critical towards themselves. A way to distance from this, to enable a more nuanced reflection, is to ask the patient what they would say to a friend having those same negative thoughts about themselves. Doing this utilizing a role play in a realistic VR environment of which the avatar has the characteristics of a friend, the effect could be even stronger. Furthermore, VR offers the chance to switch perspectives, in which the participants receive their own compassionate comments from the perspective of the friend, and experience themselves as a good friend.

The second exercise, 'Self-criticism avatar', has common grounds with the (two-)chair exercises of schema therapy and the voice dialogue method in which a patient enters a dialogue between one's inner voices. In the VR exercise, the participant will be able to choose a virtual character with a voice that represents their own inner critic and that gives them their own self-criticism. By assertively and strictly speaking up to the inner critic, after which the virtual character becomes smaller and smaller until it backs down, the participant can experience a sense of control over their self-criticism, which leaves more room for self-compassion. A discussion with the inner critic enables a more nuanced image with more self-compassion. The switch in perspective after the role-play allows the participant to see himself/herself speaking assertively to the avatar, which can strengthen the increase in self-compassion and decrease in self-criticism.

Switching of perspectives is a relatively new technique within VR, that can be of added value to regular psychological therapies. Regular psychological therapies use switching of perspectives by switching roles in a physical role-play between a therapist and a patient or in a group. Furthermore, imaginative switches of perspective are used in, for example, schema therapy or imagery rescripting. Even though this can bring new insight into another perspective, it is not possible to replay the role play where the participant can see himself/herself from someone else's perspective. This is, however, possible through VR.

The current study will investigate the two beforementioned VR exercises using two independent sub-studies, to determine whether they contribute to self-compassion and if the switch in perspective is of added value. This will be done by comparing two conditions for each VR exercise; one with a switch in perspective and one without a switch in perspective. The study aims to answer the following research questions:

• Do the two VR-self compassion exercises have a positive effect on self-compassion (increase) and self-criticism (decrease)?
• Is the switch in perspective for the exercise 'Double standards of added value? In other words: is receiving one's own compassionate response of added value in addition to showing compassion to a vulnerable other.
• Is the switch in perspective for the exercise 'self-criticism avatar' of added value? In other words: is watching oneself in a strong and resilient manner of added value in addition to assertively speaking up to one's inner critic?

Enrollment: 136 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 17 to 30 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Enrolled in a study
• Score above 20 (>20) on the subscale 'Inadequate self' of the FSCRS questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

• N/A

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

136 participants in 2 patient groups

Control Condition (no perspective change)

Other group

Description:

The intervention (two role-plays), however without using a perspective change afterwards.

Treatment:

Behavioral: Double Standards

Behavioral: Self-criticism avatar

Perspective change condition

Experimental group

Description:

The intervention (two role-plays) with a perspective change after each role-play.

Treatment:

Behavioral: Double Standards

Behavioral: Self-criticism avatar