ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Self-Testing Options in the Era of Primary HPV Screening for Cervical Cancer Trial (STEP)

Kaiser Permanente logo

Kaiser Permanente

Status

Completed

Conditions

Uterine Cervical Diseases
HPV Infection
HPV-Related Cervical Carcinoma
Human Papilloma Virus
Neoplasms by Site
Genital Neoplasms, Female
Uterine Diseases
Uterine Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Uterine Cervical Neoplasm
Urogenital Neoplasms
Cervical Dysplasia
HPV-Related Malignancy
Cervical Cancer

Treatments

Behavioral: Direct Mail
Behavioral: Education
Behavioral: Opt-in
Other: Usual Care

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other
NIH

Identifiers

NCT04679675
00002344
R01CA240375 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Details and patient eligibility

About

The Self-Testing options in the Era of Primary HPV screening for cervical cancer (STEP) trial will evaluate effectiveness of home-based HPV kits for improving cervical cancer screening uptake and its cost-effectiveness. The investigators will compare cervical cancer screening uptake within six months among women randomized to different outreach approaches based on prior screening behavior: A) Adherent and coming due: direct mail HPV kit vs. opt-in HPV kit vs. education; B) Overdue: direct mail HPV kit vs. education; C) Unknown: opt-in HPV kit vs. education.

Full description

The scientific objective of the proposed research is to study whether an in-home programmatic HPV screening outreach strategy improves cervical cancer screening initiation and uptake. Identifying new, patient-centered options that motivate continued screening initiation and uptake is essential now and in the future.

In August 2018, the US Preventive Services Task Force released updated cervical cancer screening guidelines that include human papillomavirus (HPV) testing alone (ie, primary HPV screening) as a newly recommended strategy for women aged 30-65 years. With primary HPV screening, home-based screening is an emerging option, because HPV tests (unlike Pap tests) can be performed on clinician- or self-collected samples. Self-collected samples are as sensitive as clinician-collected samples in detecting HPV and mailing HPV self-sampling kits increases screening participation. As US healthcare systems prepare to implement primary HPV screening, they will need to consider a variety of strategies. To date, HPV self-sampling randomized clinical trials have included only overdue women; no study has evaluated uptake and acceptance of HPV self-sampling kits as an alternative to in-clinic screening in a screening-adherent population.

Based on our Home-based Options to Make cervical cancer screening Easy (HOME) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02005510), most women will test negative (88%) and can continue routine screening; 11% will require in-clinic follow-up: 3% directly to colposcopy (HPV-16/18+ results) and 8% to Pap because of "HPV+ other" results or an unsatisfactory result (<1%). For home-based HPV screening strategies to be successful, ensuring high follow-up compliance in the minority of women who test positive is critical.

Enrollment

32,771 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

30 to 64 years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Washington
  • Female sex
  • 30 years to 64 years of age
  • An intact cervix
  • Has a primary care provider at Kaiser Permanente Washington

Exclusion criteria

  • Anyone flagged by the delivery system as being on a non-routine screening schedule
  • Previously randomized to the intervention arm of the HOME trial or invited to the PATH study (Participants from the PATH study and individuals randomized to the intervention arm in the HOME Study are excluded from STEP because their prior inclusion in a STEP-related research study could influence their screening uptake and affect the outcome of this trial.)
  • On "do not contact list" for research studies
  • Currently pregnant or had a pregnancy-related procedure within prior 3 months
  • Language interpreter needed

Trial design

Primary purpose

Health Services Research

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

32,771 participants in 4 patient groups

Usual Care
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Other: Usual Care
Education
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Education
Direct Mail
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Direct Mail
Opt-in
Active Comparator group
Treatment:
Behavioral: Opt-in

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems