Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Sepsis is the most common cause of death in non coronary intensive care units (ICUs). In the past 2 decades, the world has witnessed significant increase in the occurrence rate of sepsis (1).
In the ICU, sepsis maybe community acquired (already present on admission) or hospital acquired (obtained during ICU stay).
This study will add adequate data about incidence and outcome of sepsis in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit.
Full description
Objective: assessing the incidence and outcome of sepsis in Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, providing a crucially important data to increase awareness of the impact of sepsis and highlighting the need for continued research into potential preventive and therapeutic interventions.
Patients and Methods:
This prospective observational cohort study was conducted upon patients admitted at Respiratory Intensive Care Unit (RICU) of Abbassia Chest Hospital, Cairo, Egypt, either with sepsis or acquired sepsis in the RICU; from 1st of May 2019 to 30th of November 2019.
o Inclusion Criteria: Patients ≥ 18 years old with sepsis or septic shock either on admission or acquired at RICU and all episodes of sepsis for the same patient were counted.
o Exclusion Criteria: Patients with length of stay (LOS) at RICU less than 24 hours, patients readmitted at RICU during the same hospitalization, patients admitted at RICU post cardiac arrest, or patients with malignancies.
Data collection and recording:
On admission, the following was done and recorded for all participants:
Detailed medical history; including history of previous ICU admission or mechanical ventilation, last antibiotic intake, infected intra venous (IV) or central venous (CV) lines, associated comorbidities and reason of ICU admission.
Full general and local chest clinical examination.
Need for vasoactive therapy, fluid balance and need for renal replacement therapy.
Laboratory investigations:
Radiological investigations;
Microbiological samples culture and sensitivity (when appropriate): Sputum, urine, pleural fluid, or from infected IV line according to the suspected site. Type of infection (community or hospital acquired), infection site: (lungs, urinary tract, abdomen, surgical wound), pathogenic organisms (gram positive, gram negative, atypical bacteria and fungi) were recorded.
Scores:
Recording of following points:
Measured Outcomes:
Management:
All patients were subjected to the following management protocol regarding the recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle Update (6):
Study tools and definitions:
The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was used to demonstrate organ dysfunction (4). Sepsis was defined as having SOFA score of 2 or more plus evidence of infection. Septic shock was defined when persistent hypotension required the use of vasopressors to maintain a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg, and a serum lactate > 2 mmol/L that persisted despite adequate fluid resuscitation. (4) Infection was suspected and confirmed from history, examination, laboratory, radiological and microbiological investigations. ICU acquired infection was defined as infection identified at least 48 hours after ICU admission, while non-ICU acquired infection was defined as infection presented on admission or within the first 48 hours after ICU admission. (7) ARDS was defined according to Berlin definition (8). Acute kidney injury was defined as an abrupt (within hours) decrease in kidney function based on an acute decrease of glomerular filtration rate, as reflected by an acute rise in serum creatinine levels and/or a decline in urine output over a given time interval. (9)
Statistical Analysis:
Data were collected, revised, coded and entered to the Statistical Package for Social Science (IBM SPSS) version 23. The quantitative data were presented as mean, standard deviation, frequency (number of cases and percentage) and ranges when their distribution found parametric and median with interquartile range when their distribution found non-parametric. Qualitative variables were presented as number and percentages. Comparison of numerical variables between the study groups was done using student t- test and paired t-test. The comparison of categorical data was done by using Chi-square test. The level of significance was taken at p value ≤ 0.05 as follows: p > 0.05: non-significant, p < 0.05: significant and p < 0.01: highly significant.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal