ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Sequential vs. Standard Laser Treatment of Twin-twin Transfusion Syndrome

University of Southern California logo

University of Southern California

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Twin Twin Transfusion Syndrome

Treatments

Procedure: Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels
Procedure: Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT02122328
HS-09-00680

Details and patient eligibility

About

The investigators hypothesize that treatment of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SQLPCV) over the predominant method, selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels (SLPCV), may provide vascular stability to the donor fetus. The primary objective is to evaluate the perinatal outcome, specifically, donor intrauterine survival of TTTS managed by SQLPCV vs. SLPCV in a prospective, randomized trial.

Enrollment

642 patients

Sex

Female

Ages

16 to 55 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Gestational age: 16 weeks, 0 days to 26 weeks, 0 days.

  • Confirmed TTTS patients, who by definition meet the following sonographic criteria:

    • Single placenta.
    • Polyhydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≥ 8 cm in the recipient twin, prior to amniodrainage.
    • Oligohydramnios: maximum vertical pocket ≤ 2 cm in the donor twin, prior to amniodrainage.
    • Thin dividing membrane (absence of twin peak sign) or absence of dividing membrane (monoamniotic).
    • Same gender, if visible.
    • Quintero Stages 1-4.
  • Patients choosing laser therapy that have undergone prior therapeutic amniocentesis may be included.

  • Patients with an anterior placenta may be included.

  • Triplet gestations with two or three fetuses sharing the same placenta may be included.

  • Patients must be able to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients unable or unwilling to participate in the study or to be followed up.
  • Patients unable to give written informed consent.
  • Presence of major congenital anomalies that may not warrant surgery.
  • Known unbalanced chromosomal complement.
  • Prior intentional septostomy (purposely making a hole in the dividing membrane).
  • Ruptured membranes.
  • Chorioamnionitis.
  • Abnormal intracranial ultrasound findings of either fetus to include, but not limited to: intraventricular hemorrhage, porencephalic cysts, hydrocephalus, Dandy-Walker syndrome, holoprosencephaly and agenesis of the corpus callosum. Isolated ventriculomegaly (atrium 10-19 mm) may or may not be used as exclusion criteria.
  • Placental abruption.
  • Active labor.
  • Patient unwilling to receive blood products.
  • Recipient twin with a middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity > 1.5 multiples of the median (indicative of fetal anemia).
  • Any other patient deemed inappropriate for the study by the principal investigator.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

642 participants in 2 patient groups

Selective procedure
Active Comparator group
Description:
Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.
Treatment:
Procedure: Selective laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels
Sequential procedure
Experimental group
Description:
Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels
Treatment:
Procedure: Sequential laser photocoagulation of communicating vessels.

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Arlyn Llanes, RN; Ramen Chmait, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems