Shacklock Neural Mobilization vs. McKenzie on Pain and Functional Disability in Lumbar Radiculopathy

King Saud University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Lumbar Radiculopathy

Treatments: Other: Shacklock Neural Mobilization; Other: McKenzie Extension Principle; Other: Hydrocollator hot packs

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT07119697

RRC-2021-10

Details and patient eligibility

About

This randomized comparative trial evaluates the efficacy of Shacklock neural mobilization versus the McKenzie extension principle in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The study aims to compare both interventions in terms of their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional disability. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The trial seeks to inform evidence-based physiotherapeutic approaches for managing lumbar radiculopathy.

Full description

This randomized comparative trial is designed to assess and compare the efficacy of Shacklock Neural Mobilization (SNM) and the McKenzie Extension Principle (MEP) in the management of lumbar radiculopathy. Lumbar radiculopathy is commonly associated with nerve root compression, resulting in significant pain and functional limitations. While SNM focuses on restoring normal neurodynamic mobility and reducing mechanosensitivity of the nervous system, MEP targets spinal mechanical derangements through repeated extension movements. Despite their widespread clinical use, direct comparative evidence on their effectiveness remains limited.

The study utilizes a two-arm, parallel-group design with repeated measures. Participants diagnosed with lumbar radiculopathy were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups: the SNM group or the MEP group. Each group received their respective intervention over a structured three-week treatment period.

Interventions were administered by qualified physiotherapists following standardized protocols. Pain intensity and functional disability were measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively. Assessments were conducted at baseline and weekly thereafter until the end of the intervention period.

Enrollment: 59 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25 to 38 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

It required participants to have subacute lumbar radiculopathy (3-6 months duration) with radiating pain to or beyond the knee, with or without neurological signs, and MRI-confirmed mild disc bulge. Eligibility also required meeting at least three of four standardized test item cluster criteria and the ability to read and understand English.

Exclusion criteria

It included a history of spinal trauma or surgery, presence of systemic diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes), severe disc pathology (e.g., sequestration), spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis >10°), chronic radiculopathy lasting more than one year, or current use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

59 participants in 2 patient groups

SNM Group

Experimental group

Description:

SNM Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including Shacklock Neural Mobilization and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.

Treatment:

Other: Hydrocollator hot packs

Other: Shacklock Neural Mobilization

MEP Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

MEP Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including the McKenzie Extension Principle and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.

Treatment:

Other: Hydrocollator hot packs

Other: McKenzie Extension Principle