Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study compares two standard radiotherapy approaches (short-course vs. long-course) given before surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The goal is to see which treatment is more effective and better tolerated.
Full description
The SHOOL study is a single-institution, open-label, randomized prospective study designed to evaluate and compare two internationally accepted total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) strategies in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). These strategies differ primarily in their radiotherapy schedule and include:
Arm A: Short-course radiotherapy (SCRT; 25 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week), followed by consolidation chemotherapy and surgery
Arm B: Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT; 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with concurrent Capecitabine over 5-5.5 weeks), followed by consolidation chemotherapy and surgery The study acronym "SHOOL" reflects the clinical dilemma of whether SHOrt-course Or Long-course radiotherapy offers better or more practical outcomes when delivered within a TNT framework.
This prospective study aims to explore how these two strategies compare in terms of tumour response (as measured by pathological complete response, pCR), toxicity, treatment compliance, feasibility, quality of life, and local recurrence rates at 3 and 5 years. Given that both arms represent evolving standards of care, this study is designed to generate real-world data that can guide institutional decision-making and inform future definitive trials.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
150 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Shivendra Singh, MCh
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal