Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The goal of this physiological study is to determine whether ventilator-delivered sigh breaths during pressure support ventilation (PSV) provide a reliable bedside index of lung recruitability and can guide PEEP optimization.The main questions it aims to answer are:
Full description
Background and RationaleInvasive mechanical ventilation is often necessary in critically ill adults but may contribute to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) if ventilator settings are not individualized. During assisted ventilation (pressure support ventilation, PSV), ongoing patient effort complicates the assessment of PEEP response, PEEP titration, and lung recruitability.Ventilator-delivered sigh breaths (i.e., brief sustained inflations) can improve gas exchange and promote alveolar recruitment, and may permit artifact-free assessment of respiratory mechanics in assisted modes. This study evaluates whether Crs measured at the end of a sigh provides reliable, clinically useful information on recruitability and whether the ratio of Crs during sigh to Crs during an assisted breath (Crs_sigh/Crs_assisted) can guide positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) optimization.Primary ObjectiveTo assess lung recruitability during PSV by normalizing Crs measured at the end of a sigh to Crs obtained with an inspiratory hold during an assisted breath.Secondary Objectives
Inclusion criteria:Adults (≥18 years) receiving PSV with the ventilator's sigh function active.Exclusion criteria:
Protocol OverviewEach participant undergoes two sequential, non-randomized steps:
In both steps, a sigh is programmed as a sustained inflation at 30 cmH₂O for 3 seconds (pressure-controlled), per routine practice and prior literature.Sigh Setting
Data CollectionBaseline demographics (age, sex, BMI), comorbidities, and hemodynamics are recorded. At the end of each 15-minute step (baseline and PEEP+3), we perform an end-inspiratory hold and an end-expiratory hold on a tidal assisted breath and measured:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
110 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal