Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
Fluid administration is a cornerstone therapy in critically ill patient. Fluid restriction or overload can therefore change patient's outcome and mortality. Close monitoring of PR (capacity of increase the cardiac output after fluid therapy) is recommended by experts' guidelines. Few bedside simple tests are available to predict PR in spontaneously breathing patients.
A team of investigators from Lille (Roger Salengro hospital) have already showed that inferior vena cava collapsibility (cVCI) accuracy of prediction of PR is excellent in standardized sponteanous breathing patient. However, the standardized inspiration maneuver remains challenging because requiring specific and non-widely available equipment.
Full description
The primary objective of this study is to confirmed the excellent accuracy of cVCI to predict PR when standardized inspiratory maneuver is simplified.
The secondary objective is to test cVCIs in different period of cardiac cycle guided by electrocardiogram.
After receiving a loyal information patients will give their non-objection. During systematic echocardiography, patients will have to breathe in different conditions in order to homogenize their inspiratory effort. This maneuver will be repeated three times.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intolerance of inspiratory maneuver defined by:
Hemodynamic response of passive leg raising not evaluable:
Urgent hemodynamic therapy within half an hour
Modification of hemodynamic support (fluid therapy or modification of catecholamine dose)
74 participants in 1 patient group
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal