Single Puncture Arthrocentesis vs Double Puncture Arthrocentesis

Erzincan University

Status: Completed

Conditions: Arthrocentesis

Treatments: Procedure: TMJ Arthrocentesis

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT04367259

135163

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of the present study was to compare the treatment efficacy of single puncture arthrocentesis (SPA) and double puncture arthrocentesis (DPA) techniques in Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR).

Full description

Study sample consisted of 36 patients with DDwoR. 18 patients received SPA procedure and included in SPA group. The other 18 patients received DPA procedure and included in DPA group.

Double puncture arthrocentesis technique:

Posterior puncture method was used as described by Alkan and Etoz. for DPA. A straight line was drawn with a marker pen along the skin from the middle portion of the auricular tragus to the lateral chantus. The first puncture point was marked 10 mm anterior and 2 mm inferior to the tragus and the second 7 mm anterior and 2 mm inferior to the tragus. After local anesthesia, upper joint cavity was irrigated with 200 mL of Lactated Ringer's (RL) solution by inserting two 21- gauge needle. At the end of the procedure, after withdrawn of one of the needles, 1 mL of sodium hyaluronate (SH) was injected into the upper TMJ compartment through the other needle.

Single Puncture Arthrocentesis Technique:

SPA was performed with one needle (SPA Type-1 according to Senturk and Cambazoglu). The first reference point in DPA was used as the needle entry point fort he SPA. With this technique, the inflow and outflow of solution were provided through the same cannula and lumen of one 21-gauge needle as described by Guarda-Nardini et al. The joint was irrigated with 200 mL of RL solution under high pressure. At the end of the procedure1 mL of SH was injected through the needle.

Enrollment: 36 patients

Sex: All

Ages: 21 to 59 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Clinical diagnosis of Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction.
• Restricted mouth opening

Exclusion criteria

• History of systemic disease effecting TMJ.
• History of previous TMJ surgery

Trial design

Primary purpose: Treatment

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: None (Open label)

---

36 participants in 2 patient groups

Single puncture arthrocentesis (SPA) group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients presenting temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR) treated with single puncture arthrocentesis

Treatment:

Procedure: TMJ Arthrocentesis

Double puncture arthrocentesis (DPA) group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Patients presenting temporomandibular joint disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR) treated with double puncture arthrocentesis

Treatment:

Procedure: TMJ Arthrocentesis