ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Free Flap Donor Sites

The University of Alabama at Birmingham logo

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

Status

Completed

Conditions

Surgical Wound

Treatments

Device: xeroform gauze
Device: PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT03340025
IRB-300000596

Details and patient eligibility

About

Various management options for free flap donor sites that require split thickness skin grafting exist. None has proven superior from both a patient care and a cost standpoint. Major complications occurring at these surgical sites include wound breakdown, tendon exposure, and loss of function. We seek to investigate the use of the PICO single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in these surgical sites and determine if it can yield superior results to simpler methods.

Full description

Many studies have addressed the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in free flap donor sites with mixed results. It is well established that NPWT is safe and causes no harm, and no delay in healing. A previous study performed at UAB showed that NPWT in complex Head & Neck Surgery reconstruction is safe, including free flap donor sites. There have been studies that state the rate of tendon exposure is lower with NPWT in free flap donor sites, and studies that conclude there is no difference in complication rates. Current clinical practice is varied, often within a single institution.

While no studies of NPWT in free flap donor sites have noted inferior results with its use, a primary reason cited for not using it is cost. Traditional NPWT using canister-based vacuum devices adds significant cost. The PICO single-use NPWT device (Smith & Nephew) is a relatively inexpensive, low-profile dressing that does not require attachment to an external canister. It is battery-powered and disposable. Empiric use on our patients undergoing split-thickness skin-grafting to free flap donor sites shows good results with minimal intra-operative effort compared to traditional bandaging. We would like to prospectively investigate the use of this low-cost NPWT device and compare it directly to the traditional post-op dressing method.

Enrollment

20 patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • > 18 years of age
  • participants are able to consent for themselves
  • undergoing reconstructive surgery requiring split-thickness skin graft coverage of a free flap donor site (i.e., radial forearm free flap or fibula free flap)

Exclusion criteria

  • < 18 years of age
  • participants are unable to consent for themselves
  • undergoing reconstructive surgery that does not require split-thickness skin graft coverage of a free flap donor site

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

20 participants in 2 patient groups, including a placebo group

negative pressure wound therapy
Experimental group
Description:
PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Treatment:
Device: PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
conventional dressing
Placebo Comparator group
Description:
traditional surgical wound dressing of xeroform gauze and padding
Treatment:
Device: xeroform gauze

Trial documents
1

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems