Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
The incidence of a perineal tears during labor is 70 to 90%, while in 96% of the cases it's a minor perineal tear (grade 1). In about 3% to 4% the perineal tear is major and involve the external (grade 3) and the internal anal sphincter (grade 4). Episiotomy, which is considered an iatrogenic grade 2 tear, is performed in about 12% of vaginal deliveries.
Complications related to perineal tears include bleeding, the most common, that may lead to the development of vaginal or perineal hematoma. Additionally, local infection can develop and complicate the recovery from the injury. In rare cases, abscesses may occur and in rarer cases necrotizing fasciitis or recto-vaginal fistula may also evolve.
The "gold standard" method for repairing perineal tears is to use absorbable (preferably fast-absorbing) sutures. Grade 1 tears that do not bleed and do not disrupt the anatomical structure of the perineum usually do not require repair. Grade 2 tears are usually sewn in a continuous absorbent suture and less in the form of single stitches.
The use of adhesive glue to repair skin injuries began 20 years ago and the main adhesive used is dermabond® (Ethicon Inc. octyl-2-cyanoacrylate). The use of glue is faster and lead to less pain than the use of stitches or staples. It can be used for a variety of large or small, traumatic or iatrogenic wounds, with a cosmetic result, infection rate, and dehiscence rate similar to those achieved by stitches or staples.
In light of this, the investigators intend to conduct a randomized trial that will examine the advantages and disadvantages of the use of glue compared to the traditional sutures for closure of the skin in perineal tears grade 1 and 2 and episiotomies after vaginal delivery.
The investigators hypothesis is that the use of adhesive glue to close the skin in perineal tears grade 1 and 2 (including episiotomy), will be faster and associated with less pain compared to the traditional suturing method, without a significant difference in the rate of complications.
Full description
Trial design: Randomized controlled trial.
Objectives: To examine the effect of adhesive glue compared to fast-absorbable running sutures on pain sensation following repairing perineal skin in cases of tears grade 1 and 2.
Trial population: Women delivering vaginally at Emek Medical Center, and experience a spontaneous perineal tear, grade 1 or 2, or episiotomy.
Trial course:
Eligible patients will be asked to participate in this trial before perineal tear repair. Following providing an explanation about the trial, patients will be asked to provide written informed consent to participate in the trial.
The patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups in a 1:1 ratio:
Sample size In order to detect a reduction of 20% in the VAS (visual analogue pain score) within 2 hours of the procedure between the groups [from 40% to 20% in the running sutures and glue groups, respectively) with a level of significance of 95% (α = 0.05 - two tailed) and a power of 80% (β = 0.2) a sample size of 182 women (91 per group) is needed.
Data collected during the study:
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
182 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Raed Salim, MD; Nitzan Sela, MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal