Socioeconomic Differences in Alcohol Harm in Finland in a Nationwide Cohort Study

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

Status: Active, not recruiting

Conditions: Alcohol-Related Disorders

Treatments: Other: Not applicable, this is an observational study

Study type: Observational

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT05865847

KKO-Inv 4-Johto-VPT-Terveysind

Details and patient eligibility

About

This is a nationwide cohort study of Finnish adults aged 25 and older, who are followed up for the incidence of an alcohol-attributable hospitalization or death. The primary objective is to examine the relative and absolute socioeconomic differences in cause-specific alcohol-attributable hospital admissions and deaths.

Full description

Background

Alcohol consumption is a leading risk factor for death and disability, resulting in substantial societal costs and social and community harm. Alcohol-related harm has been consistently shown to be higher among people of lower socioeconomic status, despite the fact they often report similar or lower levels of alcohol use. This apparent contrast has been called the alcohol harm paradox.

Understanding what explains the alcohol harm paradox is crucial for the design and implementation of population health interventions to reduce socioeconomic differences in alcohol harm. Explanations for the paradox can be broadly categorised into three groups: (i) differential exposure to alcohol, drinking patterns and trajectories and to other behavioural risk factors and joint effects among them, (ii) differential vulnerability resulting from individual factors, such as biological characteristics, psychological traits or stress, cumulative disadvantage and broader community and societal upstream factors, and (iii) differential biases in the measurement of alcohol exposure.

A crucial weakness of existing empirical studies comes from the operationalization of alcohol harm. With few exceptions, a vast majority of studies has used a composite endpoint combining several causes of alcohol-attributable deaths or hospitalizations or even merging alcohol-attributable hospital admissions with deaths in a single outcome. While this strategy increases the statistical power to analyse rare events, composite endpoints are prone to misclassification bias by masking divergent underlying patterns and associations.

Cause-specific analyses might shed light on different mechanisms driving the socioeconomic differences in overall alcohol-attributable harm, as well as opening potential avenues for policy interventions to reduce them. The study will take advantage of a recently formed dataset covering the total Finnish population to explore associations between socioeconomic status and cause-specific alcohol-attributable events. An additional contribution to the literature will be reporting both relative and absolute inequalities in alcohol-attributable harm. Absolute differences have been rarely reported even though might be as relevant as relative differences because, from a pragmatic standpoint, they are more feasible to reduce.

The study will aim to (1) examine the relative and absolute socioeconomic differences in cause-specific alcohol-attributable hospital admissions and deaths; (2) describe the geographical differences in cause-specific alcohol-attributable hospital admissions and deaths; and (3) quantify the relative contribution of each specific alcohol-attributable cause to the overall alcohol-attributable harm.

Enrollment: 3,950,000 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25+ years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Permanent residents (defined by Statistics Finland as those Finnish and foreign nationals who have a legal domicile in Finland and intend to stay (or have stayed) for at least one year) alive in Finland by December 31, 2015
• Age 25 years or older by January 1, 2016
• Not having an alcohol-attributable hospitalization during the past three years ((January 2013-December 2015

Exclusion criteria

• Temporary residents, including foreign nationals living in Finland for less than a year, asylum seekers who have not been granted a legal domicile, temporary migrant workers and Finnish nationals living temporarily abroad by December 31, 2015

Trial design

3,950,000 participants in 1 patient group

Lowest income groups

Description:

Deciles of equivalized net household income. The method compares the whole socioeconomic distribution.

Treatment:

Other: Not applicable, this is an observational study