Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant

Cairo University (CU)

Status: Unknown

Conditions: Preservation of the Labial Bone

Treatments: Procedure: conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization; Procedure: socket shield technique

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03587597

03021984

Details and patient eligibility

About

eighteen implants will be placed in patients with non-restorable maxillary teeth in the aesthetic area.the recruited patients will be divided into two groups .group 1 will undergo socket shield technique with immediate temporization ,while group 2 will undergo conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization. to compare bone loss and aesthetic outcomes in the two techniques.

Enrollment: 12 estimated patients

Sex: All

Ages: 25 to 40 years old

Volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients with non-restorable maxillary anterior teeth in the esthetic zone indicated for implant placement.
• Both sexes.
• No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
• No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

Exclusion criteria

• Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
• Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
• Psychiatric problems
• Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Single Blind

---

12 participants in 2 patient groups

socket shield technique

Experimental group

Description:

socket shield technique with immediate temporization

Treatment:

Procedure: socket shield technique

conventional immediate implant

Active Comparator group

Description:

conventional implant placement with immediate temporization

Treatment:

Procedure: conventional immediate implant placement with immediate temporization