Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This study looked at how the gums and tissues around dental implants heal when using two different types of temporary healing caps made of PMMA (a common dental material). These healing caps help shape the gums before placing the final crown.
There are two ways to make these caps:
CAD/CAM-milled (carved from a solid block)
3D-printed (built layer by layer using resin) The goal was to find out which type leads to healthier gum tissue. What the Researchers Did
22 dental implants in 22 patients were included.
Each implant received one healing cap-either milled or 3D-printed.
Patients were checked after 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks.
The team measured:
Gum inflammation and bleeding were higher with 3D-printed caps, especially at week 4.
IL-1β levels were much higher around 3D-printed caps-showing more inflammation.
Both types had some increase in plaque and probing depth over time, but there was no major difference between groups.
The milled caps had smoother surfaces and better material quality, which may have helped reduce irritation and inflammation.
3D-printed caps were rougher and had lower polymerization (more leftover monomers), which may trigger soft-tissue irritation.
What This Means
Why This Matters for Patients
Study Timeframe
• The follow-up was 4 weeks, so results focus on early healing. More research is needed to know long-term differences.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
22 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal