Status
Conditions
Treatments
Study type
Funder types
Identifiers
About
If the study is able to demonstrate that the LRS concretely overcomes the technical limitations of diagnostic methods routinely used in laboratories, its clinical application may make possible a more accurate analysis of repeated genomic regions and offer greater sensitivity for identifying SVs (Structural Variants)
Full description
The diagnostic performance of LRS, by applying Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT), will be evaluated through a real-time targeted approach and generation of ultra-long reads, to the identification of pathogenetic variants in genetic disorders with a currently challenging diagnosis due to the presence of pseudogenes (1) and to the precise mapping of SV breakpoints identified by aCGH for the definition of their clinical significance (2).
The main aim of this proposal is to evaluate ONT efficacy in resolving diagnostic challenges faced in the clinical genomics routine, in situations when a precise molecular diagnosis is often impossible or difficult and extremely time-consuming with current genetic tests. Sanger sequencing, NGS panels and MLPA are routinely used to identify pathogenic variants and CNVs responsible for many monogenic disorders and for the analysis through aCGH patients with isolated or syndromic intellectual disability without a specific clinical suspect. These analyses are long, technically laborious and often not individually conclusive because technical limitations may lead to ambiguous results and prevent definite diagnosis. The intent is to demonstrate that ONT, through a real-time targeted approach to increase coverage in clinically relevant regions during sequencing, outperforms current diagnostic tools in terms of rapidity and sensitivity, considerably improving the efficiency of the diagnostic process. The success of the proposed target ONT approach will provide the proof of principle to implement this strategy for the diagnosis of a wider spectrum of disorders already studied in our laboratory
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
- None
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
15 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal