ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

SORE Study: Sitz Baths After Urogynecologic Reconstruction

Yale University logo

Yale University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Postoperative Pain Management
Gynecologic Surgeries
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Treatments

Device: Sitz Bath

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07215780
2000040422

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of postoperative sitz baths in patient pain perception and recovery following surgical repair of prolapse. The SORE Study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial that aims to compare postoperative pain intensity one week after native tissue repair of pelvic organ prolapse for patients undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care. Findings from this study may contribute to more robust, multimodal postoperative pain management plans if proven efficacious or, alternatively, reduce plastic medical waste and simplify postoperative pain plans if found to be ineffective.

Full description

The primary objective of the SORE study is to compare postoperative pain intensity one week after native tissue repair of pelvic organ prolapse for patients undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care.

The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate patient satisfaction with pain management after native tissue prolapse repair (and specifically posterior repair and/or perineorrhaphy), patient-reported opioid requirements, healthcare utilization, postoperative pain plan adherence, and incisional healing and complications between those undergoing a sitz bath regimen versus usual care.

Enrollment

112 estimated patients

Sex

Female

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Female ≥ 18 years of age at time of surgery
  • English or Spanish-speaking
  • Documentation of pelvic organ prolapse as evidenced by Stage 2, 3, or 4 prolapse on preoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) examination
  • Surgery to be performed by a urogynecologist
  • Ambulatory or inpatient surgery acceptable

Exclusion criteria

  • Mesh-augmented prolapse repair (robotic, laparoscopic, or open sacrocolpopexy or sacrohysteropexy, vaginal mesh)
  • Urogynecologic surgery without prolapse repair (i.e. midurethral sling, intravesicular botox, hysterectomy only)
  • Suspected genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), molluscum contagiosum virus (MCV), condyloma acuminata, or vulvar/vaginal skin and soft tissue infection at recruitment by patient report
  • Daily opioid use (short or long-acting)
  • Concurrent non-urogynecologic surgery (i.e. rectopexy, staging or debulking for malignancy)
  • Lack of access to operative report
  • Pregnant (as determined by positive urine pregnancy test on the day of surgery via standard testing or current pregnancy documented in the preoperative note)
  • Incarcerated
  • Unable to give consent/conserved
  • Unable to complete study intervention or assessment per investigators

Trial design

Primary purpose

Supportive Care

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

None (Open label)

112 participants in 2 patient groups

Sitz baths plus usual care
Experimental group
Description:
Warm water sitz baths plus usual care. 7-day nightly regimen of warm water soaks without additives.
Treatment:
Device: Sitz Bath
Usual care
No Intervention group
Description:
Care as usual

Trial contacts and locations

4

Loading...

Central trial contact

Melissa Markowitz, MD; Koray Gorkem Sacinti, MD, MPH

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems