Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
A comparative effectiveness study using an individual-level randomized design along with a pragmatic, mixed-methods approach to compare two strategies (e.g. in-person supported care, technology-supported care) all of which include evidence-based components for delivering IBD and BH care. Quantitative (e.g. self-report, electronic health record, process) and qualitative (e.g., interviews) data will be collected across multiple time points during the study period.
Full description
The investigators propose to conduct a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study of two evidence-based, patient-centered approaches implemented within an existing Specialty Medical Home (SMH) model: TEAM, an in-person, multidisciplinary team-based approach delivered at point of care and TECH, a technology-based (digital therapeutics, and telehealth) approach delivered at the patient's convenience with the guidance of health coaches. Both are designed to support care for adult patients with complex, chronic health conditions and behavioral health (BH) disorders, and will be tested in three of the nation's largest and most established SMHs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD serves as an exemplary chronic disease model where untreated BH issues have been associated with poor medical outcomes.
Primary outcomes are composite scores of measures focused on 1) IBD Symptom Severity, and 2) BH Symptom Severity. IBD Symptom Severity is measured via a composite IBD Complexity Score involving responses to two patient-reported scales: the PROMIS-GI measure and either the Harvey Bradshaw Index (for participants with Crohn's disease) or ulcerative colitis activity index (for participants with ulcerative colitis). BH Symptom Severity was measured utilizing the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), a composite of two patient-reported scale for measuring anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8). Scales are further defined in Results, Outcome Measures.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
657 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Jessica Meyers, MS Ed
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal