Speeding Recovery From Pain and Opioid Use

Wake Forest University (WFU)

Status and phase: Withdrawn; Early Phase 1

Conditions: Breast Cancer; Surgery; Pain, Postoperative; Opioid Use

Treatments: Drug: Pectoralis Nerve block; Drug: Local infiltration of bupivacaine

Study type: Interventional

Funder types: Other

Identifiers

NCT03388814

IRB00047335

Details and patient eligibility

About

Surgical treatment of breast cancer is associated with significant disability, and pain is often reported as a primary cause for declines in the ability to perform activities of daily living. However, breast reconstruction at the same time as mastectomy has been linked to higher postoperative pain, which can be a risk factor for persistent pain. The goal of this study is to determine the speed of recovery from pain and opioid use in the first 2 months after breast surgery and reconstruction.

Full description

Surgical treatment of breast cancer is associated with significant disability, and pain is often reported as a primary cause for declines in the ability to perform activities of daily living. Surgical treatments can also negatively influence social exposure and alter self-perception and sexual health. Reconstruction of the breast mound following mastectomy has several benefits in psychosocial functioning, body image and satisfaction with breast appearance, and sexual well-being. However, reconstruction at the same time as mastectomy has been linked to higher postoperative pain. Compared to autologous breast reconstruction, implant based techniques have been linked to higher requirements of postoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, and benzodiazepines as well as higher pain scores in the immediate postoperative period and one year after surgery. Recent publications report that intensity of pain in the operative area prior to surgery, body mass index (BMI), presence of axillary operation, intensity of acute postoperative pain, and amount of opioid required to achieve satisfactory analgesia in the acute postoperative period are also risk factors for persistent pain following breast cancer surgery (PPBCS). Since severity of acute postoperative pain is consistently observed as a risk factor for persistent pain, there has been interest in determining whether better acute pain control reduces this risk. Infiltration of the surgical site with bupivacaine decreases intraoperative and postoperative narcotic use, and has been associated with decreased pain scores in the immediate postoperative period. A novel approach to hemithoracic analgesia has been introduced which proposed less risk of anatomic trespass by doing a local anesthetic injection into the fascial planes of the chest wall. These procedures have demonstrated improved analgesia for breast surgeries. Unfortunately, there is a lack of large, multicenter, prospective, and randomized trials comparing these analgesic modalities and evaluating the response to these acute postoperative analgesic interventions with regard to PPBCS and other metrics of daily function, satisfaction with pain control, and self-perception of well-being and predictors of recovery from the pain state. The goals of this research are to provide short-term surrogate measures for prevention or treatment trials and to develop methods enabling practitioners to forecast recovery in real-time and that are translatable to patients in understandable references regarding risk over time.

Sex: Female

Ages: 18+ years old

Volunteers: No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

• Patients scheduled for unilateral mastectomy with immediate issue expander and implant based reconstruction.
• Age ≥ 18 years
• Ability to understand, read, and write English, and the willingness to sign an IRB-approved informed consent document.
• Patients who receive a tissue expander placement will be included in the study.
• American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III patients.

Exclusion criteria

• Patients who receive an autologous tissue reconstruction.
• Patients who receive a bilateral reconstruction.
• Patients who receive a direct to permanent implant reconstruction
• Patients with diagnosis of opioid misuse disorder or on high dose opioid therapy (greater than 100 mg equivalents of oral morphine per day)
• Patients who are wards of the state
• Patients who cannot read or speak English
• History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds with known or suspected cross-sensitivity to bupivacaine.
• Pregnant or breast feeding
• Inability to access to the internet on a daily basis

Trial design

Primary purpose: Prevention

Allocation: Randomized

Interventional model: Parallel Assignment

Masking: Double Blind

---

0 participants in 2 patient groups

Bupivacaine Group

Active Comparator group

Description:

Those patients randomized to surgeon infiltration will have a skin wheal performed with lidocaine at the site where an actual pectoralis nerve block would be performed as visualized using ultrasound. Surgeons performing infiltration techniques will be blinded to the contents of the injectate and those patients randomized to surgeon infiltration will receive pharmacy study drug labeled bupivacaine injected in the same fashion and volume as the saline group for oncologic and plastic surgery.

Treatment:

Drug: Local infiltration of bupivacaine

Pectoralis Nerve block Group

Experimental group

Description:

Those patients who are randomized to pectoralis nerve block will have randomization immediately preoperatively and will undergo the nerve block procedure using local anesthetic in the standard fashion. Those patients randomized to pectoralis block will have a standard volume of normal saline injected for oncologic and plastic surgery.

Treatment:

Drug: Pectoralis Nerve block