ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

SPIC Frequency After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

U

University of Turin

Status

Not yet enrolling

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Treatments

Procedure: 3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
Procedure: 6-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT06762353
SPIC Multi-center

Details and patient eligibility

About

The leading hypothesis behind this study is that a 3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) recalls after surgical therapy of implants affected by severe peri-implantitis yields better results when compared to a 6-month frequency. Thus, the primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare 2 different frequencies of SPIC recalls (3 and 6 months) after surgical treatment of severe peri-implantitis in terms of treatment success (absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, bleeding on deep probing ≤1 site/implant, no suppuration at all aspects, bone loss <0.5 mm) at early follow-up (1-year) and implant survival at the 5-year examination. Secondarily, this randomized clinical trial aims to assess the effects of the 2 different frequencies over clinical attachment levels around remaining teeth.

Enrollment

152 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Any patient aged 18 years or more, who has at least one implant affected by severe peri-implantitis, and able to sign an informed consent form will be potentially eligible for this trial. Severe peri-implantitis will be defined as the presence of a peri-implant probing pocket depth [PPD] ≥ 6 mm in at least 1 site of the implant, bleeding and/or suppuration on deep probing [dBoP and/or dSoP, respectively] and radiographically documented marginal bone loss > 3 mm (Carcuac et al. 2016; Romandini et al. 2022) on implants in function by at least 12-months. In the absence of baseline radiographs, implants had to present a bone level >3 mm (Romandini et al. 2021b).

Patients fulfilling the above-mentioned inclusion criteria will not be included in the study if they appear to be unable to attend the study-related procedures (including the long-term follow-up visits) or if one or more of the following systemic or local exclusion criteria are detected during the enrolment phase.

Systemic primary exclusion criteria:

  • systemic diseases (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or chronic use of medications (e.g. corticosteroids, bisphosphonates) likely to influence the outcome of therapy or which contraindicates the study procedures;
  • smoking >10 cigarettes;
  • pregnant or nursing women.

Local primary exclusion criteria:

  • history of peri-implantitis treatment on the eligible implants in the previous 6 months;
  • hopeless implants (>80% of bone loss/level).

A secondary inclusion criterion will be applied 1-month after surgery:

  • absence of peri-implant abscess on the implants to be included.

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

152 participants in 2 patient groups

3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
Experimental group
Description:
SPIC provided at a 3-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
Treatment:
Procedure: 3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
6-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)
Active Comparator group
Description:
SPIC provided at a 6-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.
Treatment:
Procedure: 6-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

Trial contacts and locations

0

Loading...

Central trial contact

Giacomo Baima, PhD; Mario Romandini

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2025 Veeva Systems