ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SALC)

U

University of Thessaly

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Postoperative Pain
Spinal Anesthesia
General Anesthesia

Treatments

Procedure: laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT00492453
UThessaly 9-04

Details and patient eligibility

About

The purpose of the study is to assess whether spinal anesthesia is or not superior to the standard general anesthesia for fit patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Full description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under regional anesthesia alone has been reported only occasionally in the past; all these reports included patients unfit to receive general anesthesia, mainly patients with severe chronic obstructive airway disease. Regional anesthesia has been used for laparoscopy in fit patients almost exclusively in combination with general anesthesia, in order to extend the analgesic effect during the early postoperative period. Surprisingly, in the era of minimally invasive medicine, regional anesthesia has not gained popularity, and has not been routinely used as a sole method of anesthesia in laparoscopic procedures. It is generally accepted that all laparoscopic procedures are merely a change in access and still require general anesthetic; hence the difference from conventional surgery is likely to be small. This statement is predominantly based on the assumption that laparoscopy necessitates endotracheal intubation to prevent aspiration and respiratory embarrassment secondary to the induction of CO2 pneumoperitoneum which in turn is not well tolerated in a patient who is awake during the procedure. However, it is surprising that regional anesthesia has been successfully used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients unfit to have the procedure under general anesthesia, but has not been tested in fit patients, in whom any presumed risk would be, theoretically, much lower. We have recently shown in a pilot study the feasibility to perform successfully and safely laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low pressure CO2 pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia alone, in fit patients with symptomatic gallstone disease. We have also noticed that spinal anesthesia results in exceptionally minimal postoperative pain. After this pilot study, we designed a controlled randomized trial in order to compare spinal anesthesia with the standard general anesthesia for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in fit patients.

Enrollment

300 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18 to 65 years old

Volunteers

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • ASA I, II
  • BMI< 30
  • normal coagulation profile

Exclusion criteria

  • acute cholecystitis / cholangitis / pancreatitis
  • previous open surgery in the upper abdomen
  • contraindication for pneumoperitoneum
  • contraindication for spinal anesthesia (ie spinal deformity)

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Crossover Assignment

Masking

Single Blind

300 participants in 2 patient groups

1
Active Comparator group
Description:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia
Treatment:
Procedure: laparoscopic cholecystectomy
2
Active Comparator group
Description:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia
Treatment:
Procedure: laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

George Tzovaras, MD

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems