ClinicalTrials.Veeva

Menu

Spring Loaded Syringe for Active Silicon Oil Extraction

S

Sohag University

Status

Enrolling

Conditions

Retinal Detachment

Treatments

Device: Vitrectomy machine
Device: Spring loaded syringe

Study type

Interventional

Funder types

Other

Identifiers

NCT07363889
Soh-Med-25-11-9PD

Details and patient eligibility

About

The aim of our study is to compare between two techniques used for active SOR. The outcomes include efficiency and safety.

Patients with silicon filled eyes and prepared for SOR 540 eyes of 505 patients (one eye in 470 patients, and both eyes in 35 patients) were enrolled in the study.

All eyes underwent SOR using 23-Gauge PPV. The eyes were classified according to the surgical technique used for SOR into two groups:- Group A: SOR was performed using SO extraction program built in Optikon vitrectomy device Group B: SOR was performed using modified spring loaded syringe.

Enrollment

200 estimated patients

Sex

All

Ages

18+ years old

Volunteers

No Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients subjected previously to pars plana vitrectomy with silicon oil tamponade.

Exclusion criteria

  • Recurrent retinal detachment
  • Previous scleral buckling
  • Previous glaucoma surgery
  • Bleeding tendencies
  • Anterior staphyloma

Trial design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Randomized

Interventional model

Parallel Assignment

Masking

Double Blind

200 participants in 2 patient groups

Group A
Active Comparator group
Description:
Conventional technique using vitrectomy machine
Treatment:
Device: Vitrectomy machine
Group B
Active Comparator group
Description:
Spring loaded syringe for silicon oil extraction
Treatment:
Device: Spring loaded syringe

Trial contacts and locations

1

Loading...

Central trial contact

Alaa A A Sinjab, Doctor degree in Ophthalmology

Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov

Clinical trials

Find clinical trialsTrials by location
© Copyright 2026 Veeva Systems