Status
Conditions
Treatments
About
This is a preliminary study to establish the issues and potential of the investigators proposed project, which involves recruitment of patients with and without dementia, who have been admitted to hospital following hip fractures. The study will be evaluating the result of treatment of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures focusing on how soon mobility is restored leading to their independence. These patients would require surgical fixation (not replacement) of their hip fractures.
The study will evaluate two methods of fixation of hip fractures treated with either a pin (nail) which is inserted within the cavity of the thigh bone or a hip screw with a plate which is applied on the outer aspect of the thigh bone.
The data collected from this study will provide information on whether one method of fixation is better than the other.
Full description
The investigators have organised a Patient Feedback Session in Leeds, comprising of patients who previously sustained hip fractures and who underwent surgical fixation (either cephalomedullary nail or dynamic/sliding hip screw). According to the feedback that was provided, the most important issue highlighted was how quickly the patients regain their functional capacity (mobility) and by inference their independence and overall quality of life, to pre-injury levels. The length of hospital stay was also an important parameter in their judgement.
Based on this patient feedback session, the design of a study evaluating the result of treatment of unstable pertrochanteric hip fractures should focus on how soon mobility is restored leading to their independence. Moreover, using the length of hospital stay as a secondary outcome would not only act as a surrogate of mobility (hospital discharge is determined by ability to safely mobilize), but would have huge implication to health care cost as well, which is considered as a major contributor for the majority of the overall hospital costs. Finally, it has been shown that up to 50% of hip fracture patients have dementia, which has been reported to be an independent risk factor of poor outcome following hip fractures. The investigators can therefore argue that it is even more important that this cohort of patients be treated with a superior implant, and thus be included in studies. However, currently, there is limited experience with regards to clinical trials which involve surgical patients with dementia, particularly on issues of consent, recruitment and retention/follow-up. This was highlighted by a recent review, who found that 8 out of 10 hip fracture trials excluded or ignored the patient population with cognitive impairment. However, with up to one in three patients with hip fractures presenting simultaneously with some degree of dementia, this is an important population to include.
The investigators therefore propose concept feasibility study, to investigate the feasibility of running a study involving patients with and without dementia to investigate the outcome of unstable pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type A2), comparing the implantation of the Endovis BA 2 cephalomedullary nail (device conferring biomechanical advantage) to the Dynamic/Sliding Hip Screw (current "gold standard").
Patients who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be invited to participate in this study. Following patient or patient's carer/personal or nominated consultee providing informed consent/assent to participate in the study they will be randomized using an online randomisation tool, by permuted blocks, stratified for cognitive status (AMTS<8/≥8).
The abbreviated mental test score (AMTS) can rapidly assess elderly patients for the possibility of dementia and can assess for confusion and other cognitive impairment. The doctor seeing the patient will conduct the AMTS as standard of care.
Although patients will not be told of their allocation but cannot be considered blinded as they may guess which group they have been allocated based on the incision size. The assessor for clinical outcomes, such as the TUG assessment will be blinded to group allocation.
Following surgery, patients will be followed-up at week 2, 4 and 12 post-operation (as per standard of care practice). Information collected during these visits will include, hip X-rays, functional scores (Lower Extremity Measure, London Handicap Scale, DEMQOL), TUG (Timed Up and Go) test, complications/adverse events and concomitant medication requirements.
Within standard care patients undergo the above stages, the only extra measures with this research project from the above are the Lower Extremity measure, London Handicap Scale and TUG test.
Lower Extremity Measure will be used on patients with AMTS score ≥8 only whereas London Handicap Scale will be used on patients with AMTS score ≥8 only.
The TUG test involves standing up from a seated position, walking three metres, turning around, and then walking three metres back to chair and returning to the seated position. The TUG times will be noted down.
The extra measures besides the TUG test are questionnaires which will be given to patients to complete with the help of the Research Nurse.
The DEMQOL will involve carers completing the Carer part of the DEMQOL questionnaire. For those patients coming from nursing home's the nursing home staff will complete the DEMQOL carer questionnaire.
Enrollment
Sex
Ages
Volunteers
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Unable to ambulate pre-injury, even with walking aids
Unable to undergo surgical fixation within 7 days of admission
Patient is for any reason considered unable to carry out the required study assessments or complete the follow-up visit schedule, in the opinion of the investigating team
Previous stroke (non-recovered)
Recent myocardial infarction (up to 60 days)
Presence of fracture(s) in contralateral leg
Presence of fracture(s) in ipsilateral leg, in addition to the pertrochanteric hip fracture
Known renal or hepatic failure as defined by:
Elevated transaminases ≥ 2.0 x upper limits of normal for:
Significantly impaired renal function as determined by a derived creatinine clearance of ≤ 30 mL/min using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation21
Primary purpose
Allocation
Interventional model
Masking
60 participants in 2 patient groups
Loading...
Central trial contact
Peter Giannoudis, MBBS,CCST,MD
Data sourced from clinicaltrials.gov
Clinical trials
Research sites
Resources
Legal